Literature DB >> 16240191

Gravimetric and chemical features of airborne PM 10 AND PM 2.5 in mainland Portugal.

M C Freitas1, M M Farinha, M G Ventura, S M Almeida, M A Reis, A M G Pacheco.   

Abstract

This paper describes concentration amounts of arsenic (As), particulate mercury (Hg), nickel (Ni) and lead (Pb) in PM(10) and PM(2.5), collected since 1993 by the Technological and Nuclear Institute (ITN) at different locations in mainland Portugal, featuring urban, industrial and rural environments, and a control as well. Most results were obtained in the vicinity of coal- and oil-fired power plants. Airborne mass concentrations were determined by gravimetry. As and Hg concentrations were obtained through instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA), and Ni and Pb concentrations through proton-induced X-ray emission (PIXE). Comparison with the EU (European Union) and the US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) directives for Ambient Air has been carried out, even though the sampling protocols herein--set within the framework of ITN's R&D projects and/or monitoring contracts--were not consistent with the former regulations. Taking this into account, 1) the EU daily limit for PM(10) was exceeded a few times in all sites except the control, even if the number of times was still inferior to the allowed one; 2) the EU annual mean for PM(10) was exceeded at one site; 3) the EPA daily limit for PM(2.5) was exceeded one time at three sites; 4) the EPA annual mean for PM(2.5) was exceeded at most sites; 5) the inner-Lisbon site approached or exceeded the legislated PMs; 6) Pb levels stayed far below the EU limit value; and 7) concentrations of As, Ni and Hg were also far less than the reference values adopted by EU. In every location, Ni appeared more concentrated in PM(2.5) than in coarser particles, and its levels were not that different from site to site, excluding the control. The highest As and Hg concentrations were found in the neighbourhood of the coal-fired, utility power plants. The results may be viewed as a "worst-case scenario" of atmospheric pollution, since they have been obtained in busy urban-industrial areas and/or near major power-generation and waste-incineration facilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16240191     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-005-5841-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  14 in total

1.  Daily mortality and PM10 pollution in Utah Valley.

Authors:  C A Pope; J Schwartz; M R Ransom
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1992 May-Jun

2.  Associations between 1980 U.S. mortality rates and alternative measures of airborne particle concentration.

Authors:  H Ozkaynak; G D Thurston
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  What are people dying of on high air pollution days?

Authors:  J Schwartz
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities.

Authors:  D W Dockery; C A Pope; X Xu; J D Spengler; J H Ware; M E Fay; B G Ferris; F E Speizer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Acute respiratory effects of particulate air pollution.

Authors:  D W Dockery; C A Pope
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 21.981

6.  Soluble transition metals mediate residual oil fly ash induced acute lung injury.

Authors:  K L Dreher; R H Jaskot; J R Lehmann; J H Richards; J K McGee; A J Ghio; D L Costa
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1997-02-21

7.  Increasing rates of atmospheric mercury deposition in midcontinental north america.

Authors:  E B Swain; D R Engstrom; M E Brigham; T A Henning; P L Brezonik
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-08-07       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The relationship of daily mortality to suspended particulates in Santa Clara County, 1980-1986.

Authors:  D Fairley
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Associations between air pollution and mortality in Phoenix, 1995-1997.

Authors:  T F Mar; G A Norris; J Q Koenig; T V Larson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Estimating the mortality impacts of particulate matter: what can be learned from between-study variability?

Authors:  J I Levy; J K Hammitt; J D Spengler
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  2 in total

1.  Chemical characterization of fine aerosols in respect to water-soluble ions at the eastern Middle Adriatic coast.

Authors:  Ana Cvitešić Kušan; Ana Kroflič; Irena Grgić; Irena Ciglenečki; Sanja Frka
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Monitoring of ambient particles and heavy metals in a residential area of Seoul, Korea.

Authors:  Eun-jung Park; Dae-seon Kim; Kwangsik Park
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 2.513

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.