Literature DB >> 16239958

Community outreach: from measuring the difference to making a difference with health information.

Judith M Ottoson1, Lawrence W Green.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Community-based outreach seeks to move libraries beyond their traditional institutional boundaries to improve both access to and effectiveness of health information. The evaluation of such outreach needs to involve the community in assessing the program's process and outcomes.
PURPOSE: Evaluation of community-based library outreach programs benefits from a participatory approach. To explain this premise of the paper, three components of evaluation theory are paired with relevant participatory strategies. CONCEPTS: The first component of evaluation theory is also a standard of program evaluation: use. Evaluation is intended to be useful for stakeholders to make decisions. A useful evaluation is credible, timely, and of adequate scope. Participatory approaches to increase use of evaluation findings include engaging end users early in planning the program itself and in deciding on the outcomes of the evaluation. A second component of evaluation theory seeks to understand what is being evaluated, such as specific aspects of outreach programs. A transparent understanding of the ways outreach achieves intended goals, its activities and linkages, and the context in which it operates precedes any attempt to measure it. Participatory approaches to evaluating outreach include having end users, such as health practitioners in other community-based organizations, identify what components of the outreach program are most important to their work. A third component of evaluation theory is concerned with the process by which value is placed on outreach. What will count as outreach success or failure? Who decides? Participatory approaches to valuing include assuring end-user representation in the formulation of evaluation questions and in the interpretation of evaluation results.
CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of community-based outreach is a complex process that is not made easier by a participatory approach. Nevertheless, a participatory approach is more likely to make the evaluation findings useful, ensure that program knowledge is shared, and make outreach valuing transparent.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16239958      PMCID: PMC1255753     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc        ISSN: 1536-5050


  4 in total

1.  From research to "best practices" in other settings and populations.

Authors:  L W Green
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2001 May-Jun

2.  Can public health researchers and agencies reconcile the push from funding bodies and the pull from communities?

Authors:  L W Green; S L Mercer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Disseminating innovations in health care.

Authors:  Donald M Berwick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change.

Authors:  J O Prochaska; C C DiClemente
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1983-06
  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Sustainable collaboration for community outreach: lessons from the Spanish Access to Literature/Uso Directo (SALUD) project.

Authors:  Kristin Hitchcock; Kristina Appelt
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2008-01

Review 2.  Evaluation of health information outreach: theory, practice, and future direction.

Authors:  Wanda Whitney; Gale A Dutcher; Alla Keselman
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2013-04

3.  What is the 'problem' that outreach work seeks to address and how might it be tackled? Seeking theory in a primary health prevention programme.

Authors:  Mhairi Mackenzie; Fiona Turner; Stephen Platt; Maggie Reid; Yingying Wang; Julia Clark; Sanjeev Sridharan; Catherine A O'Donnell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 4.  Hubris, humility and humanity: expanding evidence approaches for improving and sustaining community health programmes.

Authors:  Asha S George; Amnesty E LeFevre; Meike Schleiff; Arielle Mancuso; Emma Sacks; Eric Sarriot
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2018-06-15

5.  Realizing Promising Educational Practices in Academic Public Health: A Model for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.

Authors:  Leah C Neubauer; Cheryl Merzel; Elizabeth M Weist; Jaime Antoinette Corvin; Allan Forsman; Jacquie Fraser; Heather L Henderson; Leslie J Hinyard; Karin Joann Opacich; Miryha G Runnerstrom
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-01-31

Review 6.  A realist synthesis of the evidence on outreach programmes for health improvement of Traveller Communities.

Authors:  M Lhussier; S M Carr; N Forster
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.341

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.