Literature DB >> 16239812

Biochemical bone markers are useful to monitor fracture repair.

L M Hoesel1, U Wehr, W A Rambeck, R Schnettler, C Heiss.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Biochemical bone markers reflect bone metabolism but little is known regarding their usefulness during fracture repair. Reduced bone mineral density may influence fracture healing. We hypothesized that low bone mineral density results in decreased levels of bone markers during the acute phase of fracture healing, especially in women who are postmenopausal. We also addressed the question of different fracture types and locations resulting in different levels of bone markers. Urinary levels of N-terminal cross-linked telopeptide, deoxypyridinoline, and pyridinoline were measured preoperatively and postoperatively in patients with hip fractures, distal forearm fractures, and in 25 control subjects. Bone mineral density was determined using quantitative computed tomography of the spine. Patients with low bone mineral density, especially women who were postmenopausal, had greater concentrations of N-terminal cross-linked telopeptide when compared with patients with normal bone mineral density or men. Patients with pertrochanteric fractures had greater concentrations than patients with femoral neck fractures, as did patients with hip fractures compared with patients with fractures of the distal forearm. These results suggest that levels of bone markers increase during fracture healing despite low bone mineral density and that different fracture types and locations result in different levels of bone markers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, Level I (high quality prospective study-all patients were enrolled at the same time with > or = 80% of followup of enrolled patients). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16239812     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000180891.03042.8d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  11 in total

1.  Effectiveness of elcatonin for alleviating pain and inhibiting bone resorption in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Shinya Tanaka; Akira Yoshida; Shinjiro Kono; Tadanori Oguma; Kyoichi Hasegawa; Manabu Ito
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Role of common biochemical markers for the assessment of fracture union.

Authors:  M Mukhopadhyay; R Sinha; M Pal; S Bhattacharyya; A Dan; M M Roy
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2011-06-08

3.  Effect of elcatonin versus nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications for acute back pain in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a multiclinic randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Naoto Endo; Keiji Fujino; Tokuhide Doi; Masami Akai; Yuichi Hoshino; Tetsuo Nakano; Tsutomu Iwaya
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  [Biochemical bone resorption markers during the healing of osteoporotic fractures].

Authors:  C Heiss; L M Hoesel; M Pausch; S A Meissner; U Horas; O Kilian; U Wehr; W A Rambeck; R Schnettler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Sequential changes of bone metabolism in normal and delayed union of the spine.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Ohishi; Masaaki Takahashi; Akihiro Yamanashi; Daisuke Suzuki; Akira Nagano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Characteristics of bone metabolism markers during the healing of osteoporotic versus nonosteoporotic metaphyseal long bone fractures: a matched pair analysis.

Authors:  L Kolios; M Hitzler; A Moghaddam; C Takur; H Schmidt-Gayk; B Höner; M Lehnhardt; P Grützner; C Wölfl
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.693

7.  Characteristics of bone turnover in the long bone metaphysis fractured patients with normal or low Bone Mineral Density (BMD).

Authors:  Christoph Wölfl; Daniela Schweppenhäuser; Thorsten Gühring; Caner Takur; Bernd Höner; Ulrich Kneser; Paul Alfred Grützner; Leila Kolios
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Bone Turnover in Vertebral Fractures: Does it Effect the Decision of Surgery?

Authors:  Zeki Serdar Ataizi; Hasan Emre Aydin; Evin Kocatürk; Ahmet Çerezci; İbrahim Özkan Alatas
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

Review 9.  Current Options for Determining Fracture Union.

Authors:  Saam Morshed
Journal:  Adv Med       Date:  2014-09-14

Review 10.  Clinical Utility of Biochemical Marker of Bone Turnover: Fracture Risk Prediction and Bone Healing.

Authors:  Byung-Ho Yoon; Woojin Yu
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2018-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.