Literature DB >> 16239719

Probing expert anticipation with the temporal occlusion paradigm: experimental investigations of some methodological issues.

Damian Farrow1, Bruce Abernethy, Robin C Jackson.   

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to examine whether the conclusions drawn regarding the timing of anticipatory information pick-up from temporal occlusion studies are influenced by whether (a) the viewing period is of variable or fixed duration and (b) the task is a laboratory-based one with simple responses or a natural one requiring a coupled, interceptive movement response. Skilled and novice tennis players either made pencil-and-paper predictions of service direction (Experiment 1) or attempted to hit return strokes (Experiment 2) to tennis serves while their vision was temporally occluded in either a traditional progressive mode (where more information was revealed in each subsequent occlusion condition) or a moving window mode (where the visual display was only available for a fixed duration with this window shifted to different phases of the service action). Conclusions regarding the timing of information pick-up were generally consistent across display mode and across task setting lending support to the veracity and generalisability of findings regarding perceptual expertise in existing laboratory-based progressive temporal occlusion studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16239719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Motor Control        ISSN: 1087-1640            Impact factor:   1.422


  17 in total

Review 1.  Harnessing and understanding feedback technology in applied settings.

Authors:  Elissa Phillips; Damian Farrow; Kevin Ball; Richard Helmer
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Elite Players Invest Additional Time for Making Better Embodied Choices.

Authors:  Matthias Hinz; Nico Lehmann; Lisa Musculus
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-06

3.  Interception of virtual throws reveals predictive skills based on the visual processing of throwing kinematics.

Authors:  Antonella Maselli; Paolo De Pasquale; Francesco Lacquaniti; Andrea d'Avella
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-09-24

4.  Recognition of tennis serve performed by a digital player: comparison among polygon, shadow, and stick-figure models.

Authors:  Hirofumi Ida; Kazunobu Fukuhara; Motonobu Ishii
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Investigating Team Coordination in Baseball Using a Novel Joint Decision Making Paradigm.

Authors:  Rob Gray; Nancy J Cooke; Nathan J McNeese; Jaimie McNabb
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-07

6.  Active prospective control is required for effective sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Winona Snapp-Childs; Elizabeth Casserly; Mark Mon-Williams; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The visible face of intention: why kinematics matters.

Authors:  Caterina Ansuini; Andrea Cavallo; Cesare Bertone; Cristina Becchio
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-24

8.  Deceptive body movements reverse spatial cueing in soccer.

Authors:  Michael J Wright; Robin C Jackson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Toward FRP-Based Brain-Machine Interfaces-Single-Trial Classification of Fixation-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Andrea Finke; Kai Essig; Giuseppe Marchioro; Helge Ritter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Where Are You Throwing the Ball? I Better Watch Your Body, Not Just Your Arm!

Authors:  Antonella Maselli; Aishwar Dhawan; Benedetta Cesqui; Marta Russo; Francesco Lacquaniti; Andrea d'Avella
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.