K W Muir1, H M Halbert, T A Baird, M McCormick, E Teasdale. 1. Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Glasgow, Southern General Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4TF, UK. k.muir@clinmed.gla.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To establish the validity of visual interpretation of immediately processed perfusion computed tomography (CT) maps in acute stroke for prediction of final infarction. METHODS: Perfusion CT studies acquired prospectively were reprocessed within six hours of stroke onset using standard CT console software. Four contiguous 5 mm thick images were obtained and maps of time to peak (TTP) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) generated. Volumes of lesions identified only by visual inspection were measured from manually drawn regions of interest. Volumes of tissue with prolonged TTP or reduced CBV were compared with independently calculated volume of infarction on non-contrast CT (NCCT) at 24-48 hours, and with clinical severity using the NIHSS score. Arterial patency at 24-48 h was included in analyses. RESULTS: Studies were analysed from 17 patients 150 minutes (median) after stroke onset. Volume of tissue with prolonged TTP correlated with initial NIHSS (r = 0.62, p = 0.009), and with NCCT final infarct volume when arterial occlusion persisted (r = 0.953, p = 0.012). Volume of tissue with reduced CBV correlated with final infarct volume if recanalisation occurred (r = 0.835, p = 0.001). Recanalisation was associated with lower 24 h NIHSS score (6 (IQR, 5 to 9.5) v 19 (18 to 26), p = 0.027), and in 10 patients given rtPA for MCA M1 occlusion, with lower infarct volume (73 v 431 ml, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Visual evaluation of TTP and CBV maps generated by standard perfusion CT software correlated with 24-48 hour CT infarct volumes. Comparison of TTP and CBV maps yields information on tissue viability. Perfusion CT represents a practical technique to aid acute clinical decision making. Recanalisation was a crucial determinant of clinical and radiological outcome.
OBJECTIVE: To establish the validity of visual interpretation of immediately processed perfusion computed tomography (CT) maps in acute stroke for prediction of final infarction. METHODS: Perfusion CT studies acquired prospectively were reprocessed within six hours of stroke onset using standard CT console software. Four contiguous 5 mm thick images were obtained and maps of time to peak (TTP) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) generated. Volumes of lesions identified only by visual inspection were measured from manually drawn regions of interest. Volumes of tissue with prolonged TTP or reduced CBV were compared with independently calculated volume of infarction on non-contrast CT (NCCT) at 24-48 hours, and with clinical severity using the NIHSS score. Arterial patency at 24-48 h was included in analyses. RESULTS: Studies were analysed from 17 patients 150 minutes (median) after stroke onset. Volume of tissue with prolonged TTP correlated with initial NIHSS (r = 0.62, p = 0.009), and with NCCT final infarct volume when arterial occlusion persisted (r = 0.953, p = 0.012). Volume of tissue with reduced CBV correlated with final infarct volume if recanalisation occurred (r = 0.835, p = 0.001). Recanalisation was associated with lower 24 h NIHSS score (6 (IQR, 5 to 9.5) v 19 (18 to 26), p = 0.027), and in 10 patients given rtPA for MCA M1 occlusion, with lower infarct volume (73 v 431 ml, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Visual evaluation of TTP and CBV maps generated by standard perfusion CT software correlated with 24-48 hour CT infarct volumes. Comparison of TTP and CBV maps yields information on tissue viability. Perfusion CT represents a practical technique to aid acute clinical decision making. Recanalisation was a crucial determinant of clinical and radiological outcome.
Authors: Darius G Nabavi; Stephan P Kloska; Eun-Mi Nam; Michael Freund; Christiane G Gaus; Ernst Klotz; Walter Heindel; E Bernd Ringelstein Journal: Stroke Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: James D Eastwood; Michael H Lev; Tarek Azhari; Ting-Yim Lee; Daniel P Barboriak; David M Delong; Clemens Fitzek; Michael Herzau; Max Wintermark; Reto Meuli; David Brazier; James M Provenzale Journal: Radiology Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J R Reichenbach; J Röther; L Jonetz-Mentzel; M Herzau; A Fiala; C Weiller; W A Kaiser Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1999 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Max Wintermark; Marc Reichhart; Jean-Philippe Thiran; Philippe Maeder; Marc Chalaron; Pierre Schnyder; Julien Bogousslavsky; Reto Meuli Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: M Wintermark; M Reichhart; O Cuisenaire; P Maeder; J-P Thiran; P Schnyder; J Bogousslavsky; R Meuli Journal: Stroke Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Aquilla S Turk; Allison Grayev; Howard A Rowley; Aaron S Field; Patrick Turski; Kari Pulfer; Rajat Mukherjee; Victor Haughton Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2007-07-24 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Marie Luby; Steven J Warach; Gregory W Albers; Jean-Claude Baron; Christophe Cognard; Antoni Dávalos; Geoffrey A Donnan; Jochen B Fiebach; Jens Fiehler; Werner Hacke; Maarten G Lansberg; David S Liebeskind; Heinrich P Mattle; Catherine Oppenheim; Peter D Schellinger; Joanna M Wardlaw; Max Wintermark Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: Jill B De Vis; Sunbin Song; Marie Luby; Jan Willem Dankbaar; Daniel Glen; Richard Reynolds; Brigitta K Velthuis; Wouter Kroon; Lawrence L Latour; Reinoud P H Bokkers Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Stephan P Kloska; Tobias Fischer; Darius G Nabavi; Ralf Dittrich; Hendrik Ditt; Ernst Klotz; Roman Fischbach; E Bernd Ringelstein; Walter Heindel Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-02-23 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Edwin M Nemoto; Oscar Mendez; Mary E Kerr; Andrew Firlik; Kevin Stevenson; Tudor Jovin; Howard Yonas Journal: Transl Stroke Res Date: 2012-05-30 Impact factor: 6.829
Authors: Tom van Seeters; Geert Jan Biessels; Joris M Niesten; Irene C van der Schaaf; Jan Willem Dankbaar; Alexander D Horsch; Willem P T M Mali; L Jaap Kappelle; Yolanda van der Graaf; Birgitta K Velthuis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-08 Impact factor: 3.240