BACKGROUND: Grafting of testicular tissue into immunodeficient mice has become an interesting and promising scientific tool for the generation of gametes and the study of testicular function. This technique might potentially be used to generate sperm from patients whose testes need to be removed or are destroyed due to therapeutic intervention or as a consequence of disease. Here we explore whether adult human testicular tissue from patients with different testicular pathologies survives as xenograft. METHODS AND RESULTS: Testis tissue from adult patients with varying degrees of spermatogenesis was grafted into two strains of immunodeficient mice (severe combined immunodeficiency, Nu/Nu). Tissue with active spermatogenesis prior to grafting largely regressed. However, testicular tissue survival was better in cases where spermatogenesis was suppressed prior to grafting and occasionally spermatogonial stem cells survived. Cases with spermatogenic disruption were not corrected by the xenografting. CONCLUSION: Superior survival of the germinal epithelium and spermatogonia when spermatogenesis was suppressed prior to grafting could provide a novel strategy for germline preservation in pre-pubertal cancer patients. This approach could also be valuable to study the early stages of human spermatogenesis.
BACKGROUND: Grafting of testicular tissue into immunodeficientmice has become an interesting and promising scientific tool for the generation of gametes and the study of testicular function. This technique might potentially be used to generate sperm from patients whose testes need to be removed or are destroyed due to therapeutic intervention or as a consequence of disease. Here we explore whether adult human testicular tissue from patients with different testicular pathologies survives as xenograft. METHODS AND RESULTS: Testis tissue from adult patients with varying degrees of spermatogenesis was grafted into two strains of immunodeficientmice (severe combined immunodeficiency, Nu/Nu). Tissue with active spermatogenesis prior to grafting largely regressed. However, testicular tissue survival was better in cases where spermatogenesis was suppressed prior to grafting and occasionally spermatogonial stem cells survived. Cases with spermatogenic disruption were not corrected by the xenografting. CONCLUSION: Superior survival of the germinal epithelium and spermatogonia when spermatogenesis was suppressed prior to grafting could provide a novel strategy for germline preservation in pre-pubertal cancerpatients. This approach could also be valuable to study the early stages of human spermatogenesis.
Authors: Ali Honaramooz; Amy Snedaker; Michele Boiani; Hans Schöler; Ina Dobrinski; Stefan Schlatt Journal: Nature Date: 2002-08-15 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Sadman Sakib; Aya Uchida; Paula Valenzuela-Leon; Yang Yu; Hanna Valli-Pulaski; Kyle Orwig; Mark Ungrin; Ina Dobrinski Journal: Biol Reprod Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 4.285
Authors: Hanna Valli; Bart T Phillips; Gunapala Shetty; James A Byrne; Amander T Clark; Marvin L Meistrich; Kyle E Orwig Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 7.329