Literature DB >> 16238898

Treatment patterns and real-world effectiveness of warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation within a managed care system.

Theodore Darkow1, Ann M Vanderplas, Kim H Lew, Jennifer Kim, Ole Hauch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine warfarin utilization and clinical effectiveness among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation within usual clinical care in a managed care system. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of health care claims for an approximately four million member managed care organization was performed. Health plan members with a diagnosis of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in calendar year 2000 were identified and stratified into two cohorts: Warfarin Therapy (newly initiating warfarin) or Warfarin Candidates (eligible for warfarin therapy according to the ACC/AHA/ESC Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation, but did not receive warfarin). MEASUREMENTS: The occurrence of thromboembolism, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhage during a maximum 720-day follow-up were compared between cohorts, adjusting for age, gender, and other risk factors, using Cox regression.
RESULTS: Among 12 539 subjects (mean age 78.0 +/- 8.8 years) with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, 4895 (39.0%) initiated Warfarin Therapy and 7644 (61.0%) were Warfarin Candidates. Event occurrences among Warfarin Therapy vs. Warfarin Candidates were: ischemic stroke, 3.7% vs. 4.5%; any thromboembolism, 7.8% vs. 10.8%; and hemorrhage, 4.4% vs. 4.9%, respectively. Warfarin therapy was not associated with an increased risk for hemorrhage (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.82-1.15), while risks for ischemic stroke and any thromboembolism were significantly reduced, by 22% (HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.65-0.93) and 34% (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.59-0.75), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Within usual clinical care for the managed care population examined, warfarin remains underused despite current guidelines recommending its use in nearly all patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Although utilization of anticoagulation clinics and INR values attained were unknown in this study, the observed risk reductions for ischemic stroke and thromboembolism were lower than those achieved in clinical trials, while no increased risk for hemorrhage was observed. These findings suggest that warfarin is used conservatively, and dosed cautiously, diminishing the full potential benefit of anticoagulant therapy in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16238898     DOI: 10.1185/030079905X61956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  25 in total

1.  Structure-guided residence time optimization of a dabigatran reversal agent.

Authors:  Felix Schiele; Joanne van Ryn; Tobias Litzenburger; Michael Ritter; Daniel Seeliger; Herbert Nar
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 2.  Coronary heart disease risk factors and outcomes in the twenty-first century: findings from the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study.

Authors:  Hemal Bhatt; Monika Safford; Stephen Glasser
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Direct oral anticoagulants uptake and an oral anticoagulation paradox.

Authors:  Cormac Kennedy; Caitriona Ni Choitir; Sarah Clarke; Kathleen Bennett; Michael Barry
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Cost effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for prevention of post-surgical venous thromboembolism from a U.S. payer's perspective.

Authors:  Aurea Duran; Nishan Sengupta; Alexander Diamantopoulos; Fiona Forster; Louis Kwong; Michael Lees
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Racial disparities in awareness and treatment of atrial fibrillation: the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study.

Authors:  James F Meschia; Peter Merrill; Elsayed Z Soliman; Virginia J Howard; Kevin M Barrett; Neil A Zakai; Dawn Kleindorfer; Monika Safford; George Howard
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  The Role Of NOACs in Atrial Fibrillation Management: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Katherine Kirley; Victoria Bauer; Christopher Masi
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-06-30

7.  National utilization patterns of warfarin use in older patients with atrial fibrillation: a population-based study of Medicare Part D beneficiaries.

Authors:  Mukaila A Raji; Matthew Lowery; Yu-Li Lin; Yong-Fang Kuo; Jacques Baillargeon; James S Goodwin
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 8.  Anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in patients on dialysis: are the benefits worth the risks?

Authors:  Jenny I Shen; Mintu P Turakhia; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Does aspirin have a role in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in total knee arthroplasty patients?

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Thomas P Vail; Penelope S Pekow; Judith H Maselli; Peter K Lindenauer; Andrew D Auerbach
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  The economic burden to medicare of stroke events in atrial fibrillation populations with and without thromboprophylaxis.

Authors:  Aarti A Patel; Kristine Ogden; Mark Veerman; Samir H Mody; Winnie W Nelson; Nancy Neil
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 2.459

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.