Literature DB >> 16238892

Early hemoglobin response and alternative metrics of efficacy with erythropoietic agents for chemotherapy-related anemia.

Shelby D Reed1, Jasmina I Radeva, Davey B Daniel, John M Fastenau, Denise Williams, Kevin A Schulman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between early hemoglobin response and alternative measures of efficacy following treatment with an erythropoietic agent for chemotherapy-related anemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Preliminary data from an ongoing randomized, multicenter, 16-week, open-label clinical trial of epoetin alfa versus darbepoetin alfa were used to dichotomize patients based on attainment of early hemoglobin response (> or = 1 g/dL increase in hemoglobin level within 4 weeks of treatment initiation). Measures of efficacy were compared between patients with early hemoglobin response and those without. Sensitivity analyses were then performed to evaluate the impact of various methods for handling censored data and hemoglobin values following blood transfusion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy measures included: the proportion of patients with a > or = 1 g/dL increase in hemoglobin by 4 weeks or a > or = 2 g/dL increase by 8 weeks; mean hemoglobin levels at 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks; area under the curve for change in hemoglobin level; proportion of patients who required a blood transfusion after 4 weeks; proportion of follow-up days on which patients had hemoglobin levels within the therapeutic range of 11 g/dL to 13 g/dL; and proportion of patients who never had a hemoglobin level within this range.
RESULTS: A total of 274 patients were included (66.1% female, mean age 62.4), of whom 48.9% had an early hemoglobin response and 51.1% did not. Mean duration of follow-up was 10.1 +/- 5.05 weeks. All metrics indicated superior longer-term response among patients with early hemoglobin response compared to patients without early response. The findings were robust across sensitivity analyses. Although the analysis establishes a significant relationship between early hemoglobin response and alternative efficacy metrics, causality cannot be inferred.
CONCLUSIONS: Early hemoglobin response is significantly associated with various metrics of clinical response to erythropoietic agents and is an appropriate measure for evaluating treatment effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16238892     DOI: 10.1185/030079905X65394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  5 in total

Review 1.  Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer.

Authors:  Thomy Tonia; Annette Mettler; Nadège Robert; Guido Schwarzer; Jerome Seidenfeld; Olaf Weingart; Chris Hyde; Andreas Engert; Julia Bohlius
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

Review 2.  Prognostic impact of the combination of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents to cancer treatment: literature review.

Authors:  L Boulaamane; A Goncalves; S Boutayeb; P Viens; H M'rabti; F Bertucci; H Errihani
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Erythropoietin or Darbepoetin for patients with cancer--meta-analysis based on individual patient data.

Authors:  Julia Bohlius; Kurt Schmidlin; Corinne Brillant; Guido Schwarzer; Sven Trelle; Jerome Seidenfeld; Marcel Zwahlen; Mike J Clarke; Olaf Weingart; Sabine Kluge; Margaret Piper; Maryann Napoli; Dirk Rades; David Steensma; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Martin F Fey; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Volker Moebus; Gillian Thomas; Michael Untch; Martin Schumacher; Matthias Egger; Andreas Engert
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

Review 4.  Speed of haemoglobin response in patients with cancer: a review of the erythropoietic proteins.

Authors:  Carsten Oberhoff
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-02-03       Impact factor: 3.359

Review 5.  Effects of erythropoietin receptors and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on disease progression in cancer.

Authors:  M Aapro; W Jelkmann; S N Constantinescu; B Leyland-Jones
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.