O Arosarena1, W Collins. 1. Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, 40536, USA. oaaros2@pop.uky.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare mandibular bone regeneration with bone morphogenetic proteins-2 and -4 (BMP-2 and -4) at varying doses. STUDY DESIGN: Defects were created in the left hemi-mandibles of 82 Sprague-Dawley rats. The defects were filled with a hyaluronic acid polymer loaded with 0.01, 0.1, 1, or 10 microg of BMP-2 or -4. Control groups consisted of animals with unfilled defects, or with defects filled with the hyaluronic acid sponges loaded with growth factor dilution buffer. Animals were killed after 8 weeks, and the hemi-mandibles were analyzed histologically using stereologic techniques. RESULTS: Mandibles implanted with carriers containing 10 microg of BMP-2 or -4 differed significantly from controls in terms of new bone area (p = 0.01 and p = 0.0001, respectively). Marrow space development occurred in a dose-dependent fashion (p < 0.0001 for both growth factors), and this effect was more pronounced for BMP-2 at larger doses (p < 0.0001 at 1 and 10 microg doses). New bone areas and volumes did not differ significantly between the growth factors. While defects implanted with BMP-4 tended to have thicker cortical bone and more trabecular bone, at least partial defect bridging was achieved in a greater number of defects implanted with BMP-2 (47%) than with BMP-4 (35%). CONCLUSION: Although similar areas and volumes of new bone were induced with BMP-2 and -4, differences were noted in the quality of bone generated with each growth factor. The results indicate a threshold dose for acute administration between 1 and 10 mug BMP-2 for bony union in this model, and > or =10 microg for BMP-4. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings suggest that differences in bone growth factor osteogenic potential deserve further study and may have an impact on the translation of osteoinductive protein therapy into clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: To compare mandibular bone regeneration with bone morphogenetic proteins-2 and -4 (BMP-2 and -4) at varying doses. STUDY DESIGN: Defects were created in the left hemi-mandibles of 82 Sprague-Dawley rats. The defects were filled with a hyaluronic acid polymer loaded with 0.01, 0.1, 1, or 10 microg of BMP-2 or -4. Control groups consisted of animals with unfilled defects, or with defects filled with the hyaluronic acid sponges loaded with growth factor dilution buffer. Animals were killed after 8 weeks, and the hemi-mandibles were analyzed histologically using stereologic techniques. RESULTS: Mandibles implanted with carriers containing 10 microg of BMP-2 or -4 differed significantly from controls in terms of new bone area (p = 0.01 and p = 0.0001, respectively). Marrow space development occurred in a dose-dependent fashion (p < 0.0001 for both growth factors), and this effect was more pronounced for BMP-2 at larger doses (p < 0.0001 at 1 and 10 microg doses). New bone areas and volumes did not differ significantly between the growth factors. While defects implanted with BMP-4 tended to have thicker cortical bone and more trabecular bone, at least partial defect bridging was achieved in a greater number of defects implanted with BMP-2 (47%) than with BMP-4 (35%). CONCLUSION: Although similar areas and volumes of new bone were induced with BMP-2 and -4, differences were noted in the quality of bone generated with each growth factor. The results indicate a threshold dose for acute administration between 1 and 10 mug BMP-2 for bony union in this model, and > or =10 microg for BMP-4. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings suggest that differences in bone growth factor osteogenic potential deserve further study and may have an impact on the translation of osteoinductive protein therapy into clinical practice.
Authors: Kevin M Urlaub; Russell E Ettinger; Noah S Nelson; Jessie M Hoxie; Alicia E Snider; Joseph E Perosky; Yekaterina Polyatskaya; Alexis Donneys; Steven R Buchman Journal: J Craniofac Surg Date: 2019 Mar/Apr Impact factor: 1.046
Authors: Jiabing Fan; Mian Guo; Choong Sung Im; Joan Pi-Anfruns; Zhong-Kai Cui; Soyon Kim; Benjamin M Wu; Tara L Aghaloo; Min Lee Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Sophia P Pilipchuk; Alexandra B Plonka; Alberto Monje; Andrei D Taut; Alejandro Lanis; Benjamin Kang; William V Giannobile Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Jiabing Fan; Hyejin Park; Matthew K Lee; Olga Bezouglaia; Armita Fartash; Jinku Kim; Tara Aghaloo; Min Lee Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Christine J Kowalczewski; Seth Tombyln; David C Wasnick; Michael R Hughes; Mary D Ellenburg; Michael F Callahan; Thomas L Smith; Mark E Van Dyke; Luke R Burnett; Justin M Saul Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Laxminarayanan Krishnan; Lauren B Priddy; Camden Esancy; Brett S Klosterhoff; Hazel Y Stevens; Lisa Tran; Robert E Guldberg Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2016-12-08 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Adam S DeConde; Douglas Sidell; Min Lee; Olga Bezouglaia; Kyle Low; David Elashoff; Tristan Grogan; Sotirios Tetradis; Tara Aghaloo; Maie St John Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2013-04-02 Impact factor: 3.325