CONTEXT: Although many studies have documented problems in communication between physicians and patients, few have focused on discussions regarding prognosis among community dwelling patients with terminal illness. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of patient race and financial status with patient and clinician reports of discussions about prognosis. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Participants' homes. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fourteen patients age 60 years or older seriously ill secondary to congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or cancer; and their primary clinicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient/clinician agreement regarding discussions of prognosis. RESULTS: In adjusted analysis, patients and clinicians were more likely to agree that discussions about prognosis had taken place when patients had a lower financial status (odds ratio [OR] 2.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-4.96), or were nonwhite (OR 2.56, CI 0.85-7.68), compared to patients who had a higher financial status or were white. Agreement about prognosis discussions was also more likely (adjusted OR 4.12, 95% CI 1.15-14.76) when patients were younger (i.e., age < 80). CONCLUSIONS: Among a cohort of seriously ill community-dwelling patients, patients and clinicians were more likely to agree that discussions about prognosis had occurred when patients were poorer and nonwhite. These findings contrast with the majority of studies examining the relationship between race or income and patient-physician communication about other end-of-life issues.
CONTEXT: Although many studies have documented problems in communication between physicians and patients, few have focused on discussions regarding prognosis among community dwelling patients with terminal illness. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of patient race and financial status with patient and clinician reports of discussions about prognosis. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING:Participants' homes. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fourteen patients age 60 years or older seriously ill secondary to congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or cancer; and their primary clinicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient/clinician agreement regarding discussions of prognosis. RESULTS: In adjusted analysis, patients and clinicians were more likely to agree that discussions about prognosis had taken place when patients had a lower financial status (odds ratio [OR] 2.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-4.96), or were nonwhite (OR 2.56, CI 0.85-7.68), compared to patients who had a higher financial status or were white. Agreement about prognosis discussions was also more likely (adjusted OR 4.12, 95% CI 1.15-14.76) when patients were younger (i.e., age < 80). CONCLUSIONS: Among a cohort of seriously ill community-dwelling patients, patients and clinicians were more likely to agree that discussions about prognosis had occurred when patients were poorer and nonwhite. These findings contrast with the majority of studies examining the relationship between race or income and patient-physician communication about other end-of-life issues.
Authors: Simon Smith; Muhammad Arsyad Bin Nordin; Tom Hinchy; Patrick Henn; Colm M P O'Tuathaigh Journal: Eur Geriatr Med Date: 2020-07-26 Impact factor: 1.710
Authors: Susan DeSanto-Madeya; Matthew Nilsson; Elizabeth Trice Loggers; Elizabeth Paulk; Heather Stieglitz; Yankel M Kupersztoch; Holly G Prigerson Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Nathan E Goldstein; Davendra Mehta; Saima Siddiqui; Ezra Teitelbaum; Jessica Zeidman; Magdelena Singson; Elena Pe; Elizabeth H Bradley; R Sean Morrison Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.128