Literature DB >> 16238438

Biological dosimetry in a group of radiologists by the analysis of dicentrics and translocations.

A Montoro1, P Rodríguez, M Almonacid, J I Villaescusa, G Verdú, M R Caballín, L Barrios, J F Barquinero.   

Abstract

The results of a cytogenetic study carried out in a group of nine radiologists are presented. Chromosome aberrations were detected by fluorescence plus Giemsa staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Dose estimates were obtained by extrapolating the yield of dicentrics and translocations to their respective dose-effect curves. In seven individuals, the 95% confidence limits of the doses estimated by dicentrics did not include 0 Gy. The 99 dicentrics observed in 17,626 cells gave a collective estimated dose of 115 mGy (95% confidence limits 73-171). For translocations, five individuals had estimated doses that were clearly higher than the total accumulated recorded dose. The 82 total apparently simple translocations observed in 9722 cells gave a collective estimated dose of 275 mGy (132-496). The mean genomic frequencies (x100 +/- SE) of complete and total apparently simple translocations observed in the group of radiologists (1.91 +/- 0.30 and 2.67 +/- 0.34, respectively) were significantly higher than those observed in a matched control group (0.53 +/- 0.10 and 0.87 +/- 0.13, P < 0.01 in both cases) and in another occupationally exposed matched group (0.79 +/- 0.12 and 1.14 +/-0.14, P < 0.03 and P < 0.01, respectively). The discrepancies observed between the physically recorded doses and the biologically estimated doses indicate that the radiologists did not always wear their dosimeters or that the dosimeters were not always in the radiation field.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16238438     DOI: 10.1667/rr3444.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  6 in total

1.  RAD59 is required for efficient repair of simultaneous double-strand breaks resulting in translocations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Nicholas R Pannunzio; Glenn M Manthey; Adam M Bailis
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-03-25

Review 2.  Historical review of occupational exposures and cancer risks in medical radiation workers.

Authors:  Martha S Linet; Kwang Pyo Kim; Donald L Miller; Ruth A Kleinerman; Steven L Simon; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Increased frequency of chromosome translocations associated with diagnostic x-ray examinations.

Authors:  Parveen Bhatti; Michele M Doody; Dale L Preston; Diane Kampa; Elaine Ron; Robert W Weinstock; Steven Simon; Alan A Edwards; Alice J Sigurdson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Routine diagnostic X-ray examinations and increased frequency of chromosome translocations among U.S. radiologic technologists.

Authors:  Alice J Sigurdson; Parveen Bhatti; Dale L Preston; Michele Morin Doody; Diane Kampa; Bruce H Alexander; Dayton Petibone; Lee C Yong; Alan A Edwards; Elaine Ron; James D Tucker
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Chromosomal radiosensitivity and acute radiation side effects after radiotherapy in tumour patients--a follow-up study.

Authors:  Reinhard Huber; Herbert Braselmann; Hans Geinitz; Irene Jaehnert; Adolf Baumgartner; Reinhard Thamm; Markus Figel; Michael Molls; Horst Zitzelsberger
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  A semi‑automated FISH‑based micronucleus‑centromere assay for biomonitoring of hospital workers exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Anne Vral; Veerle Decorte; Julie Depuydt; André Wambersie; Hubert Thierens
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.952

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.