Literature DB >> 16237207

On the correlation between composition and site-specific evolutionary rate: implications for phylogenetic inference.

Vivek Gowri-Shankar1, Magnus Rattray.   

Abstract

Model-based phylogenetic reconstruction methods traditionally assume homogeneity of nucleotide frequencies among sequence sites and lineages. Yet, heterogeneity in base composition is a characteristic shared by most biological sequences. Compositional variation in time, reflected in the compositional biases among contemporary sequences, has already been extensively studied, and its detrimental effects on phylogenetic estimates are known. However, fewer studies have focused on the effects of spatial compositional heterogeneity within genes. We show here that different sites in an alignment do not always share a unique compositional pattern, and we provide examples where nucleotide frequency trends are correlated with the site-specific rate of evolution in RNA genes. Spatial compositional heterogeneity is shown to affect the estimation of evolutionary parameters. With standard phylogenetic methods, estimates of equilibrium frequencies are found to be biased towards the composition observed at fast-evolving sites. Conversely, the ancestral composition estimates of some time-heterogeneous but spatially homogeneous methods are found to be biased towards frequencies observed at invariant and slow-evolving sites. The latter finding challenges the result of a previous study arguing against a hyperthermophilic last universal ancestor from the low apparent G + C content of its rRNA sequences. We propose a new model to account for compositional variation across sites. A Gaussian process prior is used to allow for a smooth change in composition with evolutionary rate. The model has been implemented in the phylogenetic inference software PHASE, and Bayesian methods can be used to obtain the model parameters. The results suggest that this model can accurately capture the observed trends in present-day RNA sequences.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16237207     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msj040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  12 in total

1.  A mixed branch length model of heterotachy improves phylogenetic accuracy.

Authors:  Bryan Kolaczkowski; Joseph W Thornton
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 2.  Models of coding sequence evolution.

Authors:  Wayne Delport; Konrad Scheffler; Cathal Seoighe
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  Sources of signal in 62 protein-coding nuclear genes for higher-level phylogenetics of arthropods.

Authors:  Jerome C Regier; Andreas Zwick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Assessing the state of substitution models describing noncoding RNA evolution.

Authors:  James E Allen; Simon Whelan
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  Tracing the evolution of streptophyte algae and their mitochondrial genome.

Authors:  Monique Turmel; Christian Otis; Claude Lemieux
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

6.  Can comprehensive background knowledge be incorporated into substitution models to improve phylogenetic analyses? A case study on major arthropod relationships.

Authors:  Björn M von Reumont; Karen Meusemann; Nikolaus U Szucsich; Emiliano Dell'Ampio; Vivek Gowri-Shankar; Daniela Bartel; Sabrina Simon; Harald O Letsch; Roman R Stocsits; Yun-xia Luan; Johann Wolfgang Wägele; Günther Pass; Heike Hadrys; Bernhard Misof
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Accurate and efficient reconstruction of deep phylogenies from structured RNAs.

Authors:  Roman R Stocsits; Harald Letsch; Jana Hertel; Bernhard Misof; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Phylogenomics of strongylocentrotid sea urchins.

Authors:  Kord M Kober; Giacomo Bernardi
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  A comparative analysis of mitochondrial genomes in Coleoptera (Arthropoda: Insecta) and genome descriptions of six new beetles.

Authors:  N C Sheffield; H Song; S L Cameron; M F Whiting
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Visualizing differences in phylogenetic information content of alignments and distinction of three classes of long-branch effects.

Authors:  Johann Wolfgang Wägele; Christoph Mayer
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.