Literature DB >> 16236137

Bibliometric methods: pitfalls and possibilities.

Johan A Wallin1.   

Abstract

Bibliometric studies are increasingly being used for research assessment. Bibliometric indicators are strongly methodology-dependent but for all of them, various types of data normalization are an indispensable requirement. Bibliometric studies have many pitfalls; technical skill, critical sense and a precise knowledge about the examined scientific domain are required to carry out and interpret bibliometric investigations correctly.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16236137     DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol        ISSN: 1742-7835            Impact factor:   4.080


  74 in total

1.  The bridging function of clinical pharmacology.

Authors:  Ulrich Klotz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  An analysis of bibliometric indicators, National Institutes of Health funding, and faculty size at Association of American Medical Colleges medical schools, 1997-2007.

Authors:  Dean Hendrix
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2008-10

3.  A decade of Australian and New Zealand orthopaedic publications: a bibliometric trend analysis from 2008 to 2018.

Authors:  Agesilaus W Churchill; Eva Malacova; Simon F Journeaux; Martin Richardson; Ross Crawford; Mark L Vickers
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Ireland's contribution to urology and nephrology research in the new millennium: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  E M O'Connor; G J Nason; M F O'Brien
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Global Research Activity on Elder Abuse: A Bibliometric Analysis (1950-2017).

Authors:  Waleed M Sweileh
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2021-02

6.  Research trends on monsoon research from 1900 to 2018 according to scientometrics analysis.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Yiping Chen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Bibliometric analysis of glaucoma-related literature based on SCIE database: a 10-year literature analysis from 2009 to 2018.

Authors:  Yun-Xiao Sun; Ying-Na Liu; Ying Han; Fan-Qi Kong; Yue Zhang; Siloka Arthur Labisi; Kai Cao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  On the Frontline-A bibliometric Study on Sustainability, Development, Coronaviruses, and COVID-19.

Authors:  Andrea Gatto; Carlo Drago; Matteo Ruggeri
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Milestones and impact factors.

Authors:  David M Ozonoff; Philippe Grandjean
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  Bibliometric assessment of cancer research in Puerto Rico, 1903-2005.

Authors:  Ana P Ortiz; William A Calo; Carlos Suárez-Balseiro; Mariano Maura-Sardo; Erick Suárez
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.