Literature DB >> 16235859

Design and psychometric evaluation of the Psychological Adaptation to Genetic Information Scale.

Catherine Y Read1, Donna J Perry, Mary E Duffy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and psychometrically evaluate the Psychological Adaptation to Genetic Information Scale (PAGIS).
DESIGN: A cross-sectional, Web-based survey of participants (n=323) recruited via Internet electronic mailing lists or Websites for people affected by genetic diseases.
METHODS: Item analysis, confirmatory principal components analysis, and internal consistency reliability using Cronbach's alpha were used to construct the 26-item PAGIS.
FINDINGS: Five factors (nonintrusiveness, support, self-worth, certainty, and self-efficacy) explained 57.7% of the variance in psychological adaptation to genetic information. The internal consistency reliability of the total PAGIS was .90, and the subscale reliabilities ranged from .77 to .87.
CONCLUSIONS: Psychological adaptation to genetic information is a multidimensional phenomenon comprised of nonintrusiveness, support, self-worth, certainty, and self-efficacy. The PAGIS has initial reliability and validity for use in future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16235859     DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00036.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh        ISSN: 1527-6546            Impact factor:   3.176


  26 in total

1.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  A new scale measuring psychologic impact of genetic susceptibility testing for Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Winston W Chung; Clara A Chen; L Adrienne Cupples; J Scott Roberts; Susan C Hiraki; Anil K Nair; Robert C Green; Robert A Stern
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.703

3.  Development and validation of an instrument to measure the impact of genetic testing on self-concept in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  M J Esplen; N Stuckless; S Gallinger; M Aronson; H Rothenmund; K Semotiuk; J Stokes; C Way; J Green; K Butler; H V Petersen; J Wong
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  Genetic test reporting enhances understanding of risk information and acceptance of prevention recommendations compared to family history-based counseling alone.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; Lisa G Aspinwall; Tammy K Stump; Wendy Kohlmann; Marjan Champine; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-07-16

5.  Evaluating genetic counseling for family members of individuals with schizophrenia in the molecular age.

Authors:  Gregory Costain; Mary Jane Esplen; Brenda Toner; Kathleen A Hodgkinson; Anne S Bassett
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  The genome empowerment scale: An assessment of parental empowerment in families with undiagnosed disease.

Authors:  Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Kelly Schoch; Jennifer Sullivan; Heidi Cope; Rebecca Spillmann; Christina G S Palmer; Loren Pena; Yong-Hui Jiang; Nicole Daniels; Nicole Walley; Khoon G Tan; Stephen R Hooper; Vandana Shashi
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Psychosocial Implications of Living with Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia in Adulthood.

Authors:  Ebony Richardson; Catherine Spinks; Andrew Davis; Christian Turner; John Atherton; Julie McGaughran; Christopher Semsarian; Jodie Ingles
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 8.  A nursing informatics research agenda for 2008-18: contextual influences and key components.

Authors:  Suzanne Bakken; Patricia W Stone; Elaine L Larson
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.250

Review 9.  100 years Lynch syndrome: what have we learned about psychosocial issues?

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Mary Jane Esplen; Bettina Meiser; Helle Vendel Petersen; Andrea Farkas Patenaude
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Is the psychological impact of genetic testing moderated by support and sharing of test results to family and friends?

Authors:  Julie Lapointe; Michel Dorval; Catherine Noguès; Roxane Fabre; Claire Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.