Literature DB >> 16234284

Simulating genotypic variation of fruit quality in an advanced peach x Prunus davidiana cross.

B Quilot1, M Génard, F Lescourret, J Kervella.   

Abstract

Ecophysiological models are increasingly expected to describe genotypic variation within breeding populations. Accordingly, the ability of an ecophysiological model of peach to explain variation in fruit quality among 100 genotypes of a second backcross progeny derived from a clone of wild peach (Prunus davidiana) crossed with two commercial nectarine (Prunus persica) varieties was explored. Experimental measurements were carried out to calibrate the model for each genotype. The predictive quality of the model was tested on several independent datasets. The genotypic variation in dry and fresh growth of the fruit and the stone were effectively described by the model. Prediction of the amount of total sugar in flesh at maturity was accurate, whereas prediction of flesh dry matter content and total sugar concentration was suitable but less accurate. This approach and the results have allowed physiological processes to be ranked according to their contribution to the variation in fruit quality between genotypes. Fruit growth demand and the hydraulic conductance in the fruit were the main processes that explained the fruit quality variation. Shortcomings and further potential uses of the model are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16234284     DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eri304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


  10 in total

1.  Using a model-based framework for analysing genetic diversity during germination and heterotrophic growth of Medicago truncatula.

Authors:  S Brunel; B Teulat-Merah; M-H Wagner; T Huguet; J M Prosperi; C Dürr
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Simulating the impact of genetic diversity of Medicago truncatula on germination and emergence using a crop emergence model for ideotype breeding.

Authors:  S Brunel-Muguet; J-N Aubertot; C Dürr
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Integration of Crop Growth Models and Genomic Prediction.

Authors:  Akio Onogi
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Predictions of heading date in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using QTL-based parameters of an ecophysiological model.

Authors:  Matthieu Bogard; Catherine Ravel; Etienne Paux; Jacques Bordes; François Balfourier; Scott C Chapman; Jacques Le Gouis; Vincent Allard
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 6.992

5.  Kinetic Modeling of Sunflower Grain Filling and Fatty Acid Biosynthesis.

Authors:  Ignacio Durruty; Luis A N Aguirrezábal; María M Echarte
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Optimization of Allelic Combinations Controlling Parameters of a Peach Quality Model.

Authors:  Bénédicte Quilot-Turion; Michel Génard; Pierre Valsesia; Mohamed-Mahmoud Memmah
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Optimization of multi-environment trials for genomic selection based on crop models.

Authors:  R Rincent; E Kuhn; H Monod; F-X Oury; M Rousset; V Allard; J Le Gouis
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Incorporating genome-wide association into eco-physiological simulation to identify markers for improving rice yields.

Authors:  Niteen N Kadam; S V Krishna Jagadish; Paul C Struik; C Gerard van der Linden; Xinyou Yin
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 9.  Sugars in peach fruit: a breeding perspective.

Authors:  Marco Cirilli; Daniele Bassi; Angelo Ciacciulli
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 6.793

10.  Model-based QTL detection is sensitive to slight modifications in model formulation.

Authors:  Caterina Barrasso; Mohamed-Mahmoud Memah; Michel Génard; Bénédicte Quilot-Turion
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.