Literature DB >> 1623405

The effect of direct current field polarity on recovery after acute experimental spinal cord injury.

M G Fehlings1, C H Tator.   

Abstract

Recent evidence indicates that direct current (DC) fields promote recovery of acutely injured central and peripheral nervous system axons. The polarity of the applied DC field may play an important role in modulating these effects. In the present study, the effect of DC field polarity on recovery of injured spinal cord axons was examined anatomically, electrophysiologically and behaviourly in a rat model. After a 53 g clip compression injury of the cord at T1, 30 adult rats were randomly and blindly allocated to one of three groups (n = 10 each): one group received implantation of a DC stimulator (14 microA) with the cathode caudal to the injury site; the second group received implantation of a similar stimulator with the cathode rostral to the injury site; and the third group received a sham (O microA) stimulator. Clinical neurological function was assessed by the inclined plane technique and axonal function was assessed by motor- and somatosensory-evoked potentials (MEP and SSEP). A quantitative assessment of axonal integrity was performed by counting neurons in the brain retrogradely labelled by the axonal tracer horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and by counting axons at the injury site. The inclined plane scores (P less than 0.0001), MEP amplitude (P less than 0.02), counts of neurons retrogradely labelled by HRP (P less than 0.0001), and axon counts at the injury site (P less than 0.01) were significantly greater in the group treated with a DC field with the cathode caudal to the lesion than in the other two groups. Conversely, the cathode rostral DC field caused a decrease in the number of neurons retrogradely labelled by HRP (P less than 0.05) compared to the sham and cathode caudal groups. These data confirm our previous finding that DC fields promote recovery of acutely injured spinal cord axons. Furthermore, the polarity of the applied field is of critical importance to this effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1623405     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(92)90738-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  10 in total

Review 1.  The use of micropolarization in the treatment of spinal cord lesions.

Authors:  A M Shelyakin; I G Preobrazhenskaya; V N Komantsev; A N Makarovskii; O V Bogdanov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

2.  Naringin treatment improves functional recovery by increasing BDNF and VEGF expression, inhibiting neuronal apoptosis after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Wei Rong; Jun Wang; Xiaoguang Liu; Liang Jiang; Feng Wei; Xing Hu; Xiaoguang Han; Zhongjun Liu
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 3.  Role of electrical stimulation for rehabilitation and regeneration after spinal cord injury: an overview.

Authors:  Samar Hamid; Ray Hayek
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Effect of magnetic stimulation in spinal cord on limb angiogenesis and implication: a pilot study.

Authors:  Dohong Lee; Jaewon Beom; Byung-Mo Oh; Kwan-Sik Seo
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2012-06-30

Review 5.  Therapeutic Application of Electric Fields in the Injured Nervous System.

Authors:  Niels Haan; Bing Song
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Neuroprotective effects of tetracyclines on blunt head trauma: An experimental study on rats.

Authors:  Ozhan Merzuk Uckun; Fatih Alagoz; Mehmet Secer; Oguz Karakoyun; Ayhan Ocakcioglu; Ali Erdem Yildirim; Fevzi Yımaz; Mert Sahinoglu; Denizhan Divanlioglu; Ali Dalgic; Ergun Daglioglu; Ahmet Deniz Belen
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2015-01

7.  Antinociceptive effects of dehydrocorydaline in mouse models of inflammatory pain involve the opioid receptor and inflammatory cytokines.

Authors:  Zhi-Yu Yin; Lu Li; Shuai-Shuai Chu; Qing Sun; Zheng-Liang Ma; Xiao-Ping Gu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Transcranial Current Stimulation as a Tool of Neuromodulation of Cognitive Functions in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Ivan V Brak; Elena Filimonova; Oleg Zakhariya; Rustam Khasanov; Ivan Stepanyan
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 5.152

9.  Neuromuscular interaction is required for neurotrophins-mediated locomotor recovery following treadmill training in rat spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Qinfeng Wu; Yana Cao; Chuanming Dong; Hongxing Wang; Qinghua Wang; Weifeng Tong; Xiangzhe Li; Chunlei Shan; Tong Wang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Effect of oscillating electrical field stimulation on motor function recovery and myelin regeneration after spinal cord injury in rats.

Authors:  Da-Sheng Tian; Jue-Hua Jing; Jun Qian; Lei Chen; Bin Zhu
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-05-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.