Literature DB >> 16234032

Short recovery time after percutaneous liver biopsy: should we change our current practices?

Roberto J Firpi1, Consuelo Soldevila-Pico, Manal F Abdelmalek, Giuseppe Morelli, Joel Judah, David R Nelson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Percutaneous liver biopsy is the gold standard in the diagnosis and staging of a wide variety of hepatic disorders. Complications, post-procedure monitoring, and recovery time have limited the ability for liver biopsies to be performed in a busy gastroenterology community practice. The aim of this study was to determine whether ambulatory patients requiring percutaneous liver biopsy can be safely discharged after a short recovery time period.
METHODS: All ambulatory patients undergoing a percutaneous liver biopsy at the University of Florida between February 1995 and June 2004 were evaluated in this study. A 15-gauge Jamshidi needle was used after percussion (before February 2002) or ultrasound guidance (starting February 2002). Major complications were defined as those events that required either immediate or delayed hospitalization or resulted in death within 2 weeks after the liver biopsy.
RESULTS: Three thousand two hundred fourteen outpatient liver biopsies were performed at our institution from March 1995 to June 2004. During this time, our recovery time was gradually decreased from 6 hours before 1997 to 1 hour in 2002. The majority of the complications occurred within 1 hour of the observation period or within 24 hours after discharge. The major complication rate was < or =1.7%, regardless of the observation period.
CONCLUSIONS: A shorter observation time after ambulatory percutaneous liver biopsy is safe and might facilitate the physician's ability to optimally utilize procedural space and ancillary staff in a busy ambulatory care unit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16234032     DOI: 10.1016/s1542-3565(05)00294-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  18 in total

1.  Outpatient liver biopsy: a prospective evaluation of 500 cases.

Authors:  P Beddy; I L Lyburn; T Geoghegan; O Buckley; A R Buckley; W C Torreggiani
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Prediction of drug-induced liver injury using keratinocytes.

Authors:  Rika Hirashima; Tomoo Itoh; Robert H Tukey; Ryoichi Fujiwara
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.446

3.  Complications of percutaneous liver biopsy with Klatskin needles: a 36-year single-centre experience.

Authors:  V Takyar; O Etzion; T Heller; D E Kleiner; Y Rotman; M G Ghany; N Fryzek; V H Williams; E Rivera; S Auh; T J Liang; J H Hoofnagle; C Koh
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 8.171

4.  A radiofrequency device for tract ablation after liver biopsy: a single-institution human feasibility study.

Authors:  Kyoung Doo Song; Hyunchul Rhim; Min Woo Lee; Tae Wook Kang; Sanghyeok Lim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  The safety of same-day endoscopy and percutaneous liver biopsy.

Authors:  Jonathan G Stine; Gordon Liss; James H Lewis
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Liver biopsy for parenchymal liver disease - is routine real time image guidance unnecessary?

Authors:  Anil John; Saad Al Kaabi; Madiha Emran Soofi; Muneera Mohannadi; Salva Manam Kandath; Moataz Derbala; Rafie Yakoub; Esra Mohammed Al-Ahdal; Manik Sharma; Hamid Wani; Nazeeh Dweik; Anjum John; Mohammed Tariq Butt
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-19

Review 7.  Why, who and how should perform liver biopsy in chronic liver diseases.

Authors:  Ioan Sporea; Alina Popescu; Roxana Sirli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Liver biopsy: Analysis of results of two specialist teams.

Authors:  Giulia Anania; Elia Gigante; Matteo Piciucchi; Emanuela Pilozzi; Eugenio Pucci; Adriano Maria Pellicelli; Carlo Capotondi; Michele Rossi; Flavia Baccini; Giulio Antonelli; Paola Begini; Gianfranco Delle Fave; Massimo Marignani
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2014-05-15

9.  The efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy versus percutaneous liver biopsy in patients with chronic liver disease: a retrospective single-center study.

Authors:  Ahmad Hassan Ali; Sarjukumar Panchal; Deepthi S Rao; Yujun Gan; Alhareth Al-Juboori; Sami Samiullah; Jamal A Ibdah; Ghassan M Hammoud
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2020-03-05

10.  Checkmate to liver biopsy in chronic hepatitis C?

Authors:  Anca Trifan; Carol Stanciu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.