Literature DB >> 16232248

Screening for distant metastases in patients with head and neck cancer: what is the current clinical practice?

J Brouwer1, R Bree, O S Hoekstra, J A Langendijk, J A Castelijns, C R Leemans.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The detection of distant metastases during screening influences the choice of treatment in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). There is no consensus on the diagnostic technique that has to be used nor on the subgroup of HNSCC patients that may benefit from screening.
DESIGN: Questionnaire on current practice concerning the diagnostic work-up in HNSCC patients for screening for distant metastases. PARTICIPANTS: Investigators in the 12 otolaryngology / head and neck and seven oromaxillofacial departments treating head and neck cancer in the Netherlands.
RESULTS: The response rate was 100%. Indications for screening were cervical lymph node metastases (63%), mutilating surgery (58%), locoregional recurrence (47%), advanced T-stage (32%), second primary tumour (21%). Diagnostic techniques routinely used for screening besides chest X-ray were chest CT (84%), liver ultrasound (53%), liver CT (16%) and bone scintigraphy (42%). Forty-two per cent of the clinicians were not satisfied with the current methods of screening.
CONCLUSION: This survey shows a substantial variation in indications and diagnostic techniques used for screening for distant metastases between the major institutions treating head and neck cancer in the Netherlands. There is a need for guidelines for screening for distant metastases in patients with head and neck cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16232248     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2005.01068.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1749-4478            Impact factor:   2.597


  6 in total

1.  CT staging and surveillance of the thorax in patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: is it necessary?

Authors:  Fergal Glynn; Sinead Brennan; Gerard O'Leary
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-07-08       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Metastatic disease in head & neck oncology.

Authors:  Paolo Pisani; Mario Airoldi; Anastasia Allais; Paolo Aluffi Valletti; Mariapina Battista; Marco Benazzo; Roberto Briatore; Salvatore Cacciola; Salvatore Cocuzza; Andrea Colombo; Bice Conti; Alberto Costanzo; Laura Della Vecchia; Nerina Denaro; Cesare Fantozzi; Danilo Galizia; Massimiliano Garzaro; Ida Genta; Gabriela Alejandra Iasi; Marco Krengli; Vincenzo Landolfo; Giovanni Vittorio Lanza; Mauro Magnano; Maurizio Mancuso; Roberto Maroldi; Laura Masini; Marco Carlo Merlano; Marco Piemonte; Silvia Pisani; Adriele Prina-Mello; Luca Prioglio; Maria Gabriella Rugiu; Felice Scasso; Agostino Serra; Guido Valente; Micol Zannetti; Angelo Zigliani
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.124

3.  [Follow up in head and neck cancer].

Authors:  Csilla Neuchrist; Michael Formanek
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2008

4.  The adverse impact of surveillance intervals on the sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT for the detection of distant metastases in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Asaf Senft; Gül Yildirim; Otto S Hoekstra; Jonas A Castelijns; C René Leemans; Remco de Bree
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Complete atrioventricular block as an initial manifestation of recurred oral cavity cancer: a case report.

Authors:  Jae Yeong Cho; Kye Hun Kim; Hyukjin Park; Hyun Ju Yoon; Jong Chun Park
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  Pretreatment screening for distant metastases in the Dutch head and neck centers: 10 years later.

Authors:  Asaf Senft; Otto S Hoekstra; Jonas A Castelijns; C René Leemans; Remco de Bree
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.503

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.