Eric A Finkelstein1, Derek S Brown. 1. RTI International, PO Box 12194, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194, USA. finkelse@rti.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To use a simulation model to estimate the costs and benefits of bariatric surgery among full-time employees. STUDY DESIGN: Multivariate regression analysis of nationally representative survey data sets to estimate the costs of obesity and a simulation model of the number of years until breakeven under alternate assumptions about the costs and benefits of bariatric surgery. METHODS: We used a 2-part model to estimate medical costs of obesity based on the 2000-2001 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. We estimated work loss with a negative binomial regression based on the 2002 National Health Interview Survey. Using these results, we simulated the expected number of years required for a bariatric surgery procedure to become cost saving. RESULTS: Nine percent of the full-time US workforce, or 29% of the obese workforce, is eligible for bariatric surgery. Obese workers eligible for bariatric surgery have 5.1 (P < .01) additional days of work loss and USD 2230 (in 2004 dollars) (P < .01) higher annual medical costs than persons of normal weight. CONCLUSION: Although the cost implications of bariatric surgery among full-time employees depend on many factors, the simulations reveal that 5 or more years of follow-up are most likely required for these operations to become cost saving unless the employee bears a significant fraction of the total costs of the surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To use a simulation model to estimate the costs and benefits of bariatric surgery among full-time employees. STUDY DESIGN: Multivariate regression analysis of nationally representative survey data sets to estimate the costs of obesity and a simulation model of the number of years until breakeven under alternate assumptions about the costs and benefits of bariatric surgery. METHODS: We used a 2-part model to estimate medical costs of obesity based on the 2000-2001 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. We estimated work loss with a negative binomial regression based on the 2002 National Health Interview Survey. Using these results, we simulated the expected number of years required for a bariatric surgery procedure to become cost saving. RESULTS: Nine percent of the full-time US workforce, or 29% of the obese workforce, is eligible for bariatric surgery. Obese workers eligible for bariatric surgery have 5.1 (P < .01) additional days of work loss and USD 2230 (in 2004 dollars) (P < .01) higher annual medical costs than persons of normal weight. CONCLUSION: Although the cost implications of bariatric surgery among full-time employees depend on many factors, the simulations reveal that 5 or more years of follow-up are most likely required for these operations to become cost saving unless the employee bears a significant fraction of the total costs of the surgery.
Authors: D T Levy; P L Mabry; Y C Wang; S Gortmaker; T T-K Huang; T Marsh; M Moodie; B Swinburn Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: John B Dixon; Nora E Straznicky; Elisabeth A Lambert; Markus P Schlaich; Gavin W Lambert Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2011-07-05 Impact factor: 46.802
Authors: Bruce C M Wang; Edwin S Wong; Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho; Hao He; David R Flum; David E Arterburn; Louis P Garrison; Sean D Sullivan Journal: Eur J Health Econ Date: 2013-03-24
Authors: Thomas J Hoerger; Ping Zhang; Joel E Segel; Henry S Kahn; Lawrence E Barker; Steven Couper Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 17.152