BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The metabolic activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 is genetically determined, and the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole, a substrate for CYP2C19, are dependent on the CYP2C19 genotype. However, a discrepancy between the CYP2C19 genotype and omeprazole pharmacokinetics was reported in patients with liver disease or advanced cancer. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of aging on the relationship between the CYP2C19 genotype and its phenotype. METHODS: Twenty-eight elderly and 23 young Japanese volunteers were enrolled after being genotyped. Each subject received a single intravenous dose of omeprazole (10 mg and 20 mg for the elderly and the young groups, respectively) and blood samples were obtained up to 6 hours after dose administration to determine the plasma concentrations of omeprazole and its metabolites, 5-hydroxyomeprazole and omeprazole sulfone. Pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained by noncompartmental analysis. Linear regression models were used to examine the joint effects of covariates such as genotype, age, etc., on the pharmacokinetic parameters, and the pharmacokinetic parameters showing statistical significance were compared by ANOVA. RESULTS: There were significant differences between genotypes in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of the young group and the elderly group. The number of mutation alleles and age were significant covariates for systemic clearance (CL), but age was the only significant covariate for volume of distribution at steady state (Vss). There were significant age- and genotype-related differences and a significant age x genotype interaction in CL (20.6+/-11.0/12.7+/-4.0/3.2+/-1.0 and 5.4+/-4.0/3.7+/-1.4/2.1+/-0.7 L/h for homozygous extensive metabolisers [EMs]/heterozygous EMs/poor metabolisers [PMs] of the young and the elderly groups, respectively). In Vss, a significant difference was found between the young and the elderly groups (219+/-115 and 107+/-44.5 mL/kg, respectively), but not between three genotypes (178+/-142, 173+/-79 and 110+/-51 mL/kg for homozygous EMs, heterozygous EMs and PMs, respectively). CONCLUSION: The elderly EMs showed wide variance in the in vivo CYP2C19 activity and were phenotypically closer to the elderly PMs than the young EMs were to the young PMs. Some of the elderly homozygous EMs, as well as heterozygous EMs, have a metabolic activity similar to PMs, and the CYP2C19 genotype may therefore not be as useful as phenotyping in the elderly.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The metabolic activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 is genetically determined, and the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole, a substrate for CYP2C19, are dependent on the CYP2C19 genotype. However, a discrepancy between the CYP2C19 genotype and omeprazole pharmacokinetics was reported in patients with liver disease or advanced cancer. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of aging on the relationship between the CYP2C19 genotype and its phenotype. METHODS: Twenty-eight elderly and 23 young Japanese volunteers were enrolled after being genotyped. Each subject received a single intravenous dose of omeprazole (10 mg and 20 mg for the elderly and the young groups, respectively) and blood samples were obtained up to 6 hours after dose administration to determine the plasma concentrations of omeprazole and its metabolites, 5-hydroxyomeprazole and omeprazole sulfone. Pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained by noncompartmental analysis. Linear regression models were used to examine the joint effects of covariates such as genotype, age, etc., on the pharmacokinetic parameters, and the pharmacokinetic parameters showing statistical significance were compared by ANOVA. RESULTS: There were significant differences between genotypes in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of the young group and the elderly group. The number of mutation alleles and age were significant covariates for systemic clearance (CL), but age was the only significant covariate for volume of distribution at steady state (Vss). There were significant age- and genotype-related differences and a significant age x genotype interaction in CL (20.6+/-11.0/12.7+/-4.0/3.2+/-1.0 and 5.4+/-4.0/3.7+/-1.4/2.1+/-0.7 L/h for homozygous extensive metabolisers [EMs]/heterozygous EMs/poor metabolisers [PMs] of the young and the elderly groups, respectively). In Vss, a significant difference was found between the young and the elderly groups (219+/-115 and 107+/-44.5 mL/kg, respectively), but not between three genotypes (178+/-142, 173+/-79 and 110+/-51 mL/kg for homozygous EMs, heterozygous EMs and PMs, respectively). CONCLUSION: The elderly EMs showed wide variance in the in vivo CYP2C19 activity and were phenotypically closer to the elderly PMs than the young EMs were to the young PMs. Some of the elderly homozygous EMs, as well as heterozygous EMs, have a metabolic activity similar to PMs, and the CYP2C19 genotype may therefore not be as useful as phenotyping in the elderly.
Authors: T Furuta; K Ohashi; K Kosuge; X J Zhao; M Takashima; M Kimura; M Nishimoto; H Hanai; E Kaneko; T Ishizaki Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: J Christopher Gorski; Suda Vannaprasaht; Mitchell A Hamman; Walter T Ambrosius; Melissa A Bruce; Barbara Haehner-Daniels; Stephen D Hall Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Xia Yang; Bin Zhang; Cliona Molony; Eugene Chudin; Ke Hao; Jun Zhu; Andrea Gaedigk; Christine Suver; Hua Zhong; J Steven Leeder; F Peter Guengerich; Stephen C Strom; Erin Schuetz; Thomas H Rushmore; Roger G Ulrich; J Greg Slatter; Eric E Schadt; Andrew Kasarskis; Pek Yee Lum Journal: Genome Res Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Eileen B Lawson; Jerry C Wu; R Michael Baldwin; Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg; Staffan Rosenborg; Dong-Seok Yim; Ophelia Q P Yin; Edmund V Capparelli; Joseph D Ma Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2011-10-19 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Nuala A Helsby; Wing-Yee Lo; Ian J Simpson; David M Voss; Kaye E Logan; Martin Searle; John B W Schollum; Janak R de Zoysa Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.335