Literature DB >> 16231754

Status of home blood pressure measured in morning and evening: evaluation in normotensives and hypertensives in Japanese urban population.

Hiroshi Kawabe1, Ikuo Saito, Takao Saruta.   

Abstract

To assess home blood pressure status in a Japanese urban population, we analyzed home blood pressure values in normotensive subjects determined by casual blood pressure (< 140/90 mmHg), hypertensive subjects without medication (> or = 140/90 mmHg) and treated hypertensive patients. The subjects (468 male, 232 female; mean age 41 years old) were recruited from a company located in Tokyo. Home blood pressure was measured with a semi-automatic device (Omron HEM-759P). Subjects were instructed to perform triplicate morning and evening measurements on 7 consecutive days. In the treated hypertensive group (n = 70), there was a significant difference between morning (139 +/- 12/88 +/- 9 mmHg) and evening (130 +/- 12/79 +/- 8 mmHg) home blood pressure. In the normotensive group (n = 558), however, only the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) component of the home blood pressure was significantly different between morning (115 +/- 13/72 +/- 9 mmHg) and evening (114 +/- 12/68 +/- 8 mmHg). In the nontreated hypertensive group (n = 72), casual blood pressure (145 +/- 14/92 +/- 9 mmHg) was higher than morning (138 +/- 16/89 +/- 11 mmHg) and evening (134 +/- 16/83 +/- 11 mmHg) home blood pressure, but no difference was seen between morning and evening systolic blood pressure (SBP). According to the reference value of the Japanese Society of Hypertension 2004 (SBP > or = 135 mmHg and/or DBP > or = 85 mmHg), 7.2% (systolic) and 8.7% (diastolic) of subjects in the normotensive group were classified as hypertensive by home blood pressure. Casual blood pressure in the treated hypertensive group was normal in 64.3% for SBP and 70.0% for DBP. However, their morning SBP (32.9%), morning DBP (40.0%), evening SBP (10.0%), and evening DBP (17.1%) were classified as hypertensive by home blood pressure. Furthermore, patients who were taking antihypertensive drug(s) only in the morning (n = 52) showed higher morning SBP (6 mmHg, p = 0.086) and morning DBP (6 mmHg, p = 0.005) than patients taking drug(s) by other administration schedules (n = 18), but no difference in evening home blood pressure was observed. In conclusion, a proportion of the subjects defined as normotensive by casual blood pressure were classified as hypertensive by home blood pressure in the present urban population. Furthermore, morning home blood pressure control in the treated hypertensive group classified as under control by casual blood pressure was insufficient, especially in patients who were taking medication only in the morning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16231754     DOI: 10.1291/hypres.28.491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Res        ISSN: 0916-9636            Impact factor:   3.872


  7 in total

Review 1.  Clinical significance of home blood pressure and its possible practical application.

Authors:  Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.801

Review 2.  Morning hypertension.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Adult mortality attributable to preventable risk factors for non-communicable diseases and injuries in Japan: a comparative risk assessment.

Authors:  Nayu Ikeda; Manami Inoue; Hiroyasu Iso; Shunya Ikeda; Toshihiko Satoh; Mitsuhiko Noda; Tetsuya Mizoue; Hironori Imano; Eiko Saito; Kota Katanoda; Tomotaka Sobue; Shoichiro Tsugane; Mohsen Naghavi; Majid Ezzati; Kenji Shibuya
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 11.069

4.  Determinants of the Morning-Evening Home Blood Pressure Difference in Treated Hypertensives: The HIBA-Home Study.

Authors:  Lucas S Aparicio; Jessica Barochiner; Paula E Cuffaro; José Alfie; Marcelo A Rada; Margarita S Morales; Carlos R Galarza; Marcos J Marín; Gabriel D Waisman
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 2.420

5.  Arterial stiffening is a crucial factor for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in a community-based normotensive population.

Authors:  Maeda Mika; Hideaki Kanzaki; Takuya Hasegawa; Hiroki Fukuda; Makoto Amaki; Jiyoong Kim; Masanori Asakura; Hiroshi Asanuma; Motonobu Nishimura; Masafumi Kitakaze
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Hypertens       Date:  2020-06-20

6.  Effect of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist olmesartan on morning home blood pressure in hypertension: HONEST study at 16 weeks.

Authors:  K Kario; I Saito; T Kushiro; S Teramukai; Y Ishikawa; K Hiramatsu; F Kobayashi; K Shimada
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 7.  Home and Office Blood Pressure Control among Treated Hypertensive Patients in Japan: Findings from the Japan Home versus Office Blood Pressure Measurement Evaluation (J-HOME) Study.

Authors:  Taku Obara; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Michihiro Satoh; Nariyasu Mano; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2010-02-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.