INTRODUCTION: Local recurrence and peritoneal dissemination is common after intentionally curative resection of colorectal carcinoma. It is not yet clear which mechanisms stimulate post-operative intra-abdominal tumor development. Enhanced adhesion or growth of tumor cells and/or post-operative immuno suppression may influence tumor recurrence. AIMS OF THE STUDY: In the present study, we evaluated effects of local and remote surgery on intra-abdominal tumor development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A standardized intra-abdominal trauma was inflicted by rubbing both uterus horns in laparotomy groups, while a dorsolateral thoracotomy was performed in thoracotomy groups (on day -1, 0, or +3). To induce tumor development rats were injected intra-peritoneally with the coloncarcinoma cell line CC531s on day 0 and evaluated after 21 days. RESULTS: Rats undergoing laparotomy and injection on day 0 showed significantly higher tumorload than control rats (195 +/- 20 vs. 47 +/- 29, P < 0.001). When a laparotomy was performed, the day before tumor inoculation even higher tumorload was seen (245 +/- 37 vs. 195 +/- 20, P < 0.01). Strikingly, performing a thoracotomy on the day before or on the same day as tumor inoculation resulted in enhanced tumorload compared to controls as well (135 +/- 84 vs. 47 +/- 29; P < 0.001 and 88 +/- 38 vs. 47 +/- 29; P < 0.02, respectively). Either laparotomy or thoracotomy 3 days after tumor cell inoculation did not affect growth of pre-existing tumor cell clusters. CONCLUSIONS: The (post) surgical intra-peritoneal microenvironment enhances successful implantation of spilled tumor cells, whereas growth of adhered tumor cell clusters is not affected. The inflammatory response as a result of remote surgery promotes successful tumor development as well. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
INTRODUCTION: Local recurrence and peritoneal dissemination is common after intentionally curative resection of colorectal carcinoma. It is not yet clear which mechanisms stimulate post-operative intra-abdominal tumor development. Enhanced adhesion or growth of tumor cells and/or post-operative immuno suppression may influence tumor recurrence. AIMS OF THE STUDY: In the present study, we evaluated effects of local and remote surgery on intra-abdominal tumor development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A standardized intra-abdominal trauma was inflicted by rubbing both uterus horns in laparotomy groups, while a dorsolateral thoracotomy was performed in thoracotomy groups (on day -1, 0, or +3). To induce tumor development rats were injected intra-peritoneally with the coloncarcinoma cell line CC531s on day 0 and evaluated after 21 days. RESULTS:Rats undergoing laparotomy and injection on day 0 showed significantly higher tumorload than control rats (195 +/- 20 vs. 47 +/- 29, P < 0.001). When a laparotomy was performed, the day before tumor inoculation even higher tumorload was seen (245 +/- 37 vs. 195 +/- 20, P < 0.01). Strikingly, performing a thoracotomy on the day before or on the same day as tumor inoculation resulted in enhanced tumorload compared to controls as well (135 +/- 84 vs. 47 +/- 29; P < 0.001 and 88 +/- 38 vs. 47 +/- 29; P < 0.02, respectively). Either laparotomy or thoracotomy 3 days after tumor cell inoculation did not affect growth of pre-existing tumor cell clusters. CONCLUSIONS: The (post) surgical intra-peritoneal microenvironment enhances successful implantation of spilled tumor cells, whereas growth of adhered tumor cell clusters is not affected. The inflammatory response as a result of remote surgery promotes successful tumor development as well. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Eduardo de Santibañes; Diego Fernandez; Carlos Vaccaro; Guillermo Ojea Quintana; Fernando Bonadeo; Juan Pekolj; Carlos Bonofiglio; Ernesto Molmenti Journal: World J Surg Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Wim Bouquet; Steven Deleye; Steven Staelens; Lieselotte De Smet; Nancy Van Damme; Isabelle Debergh; Wim P Ceelen; Filip De Vos; Jean Paul Remon; Chris Vervaet Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2011-03-18 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: E M V de Cuba; R Kwakman; M van Egmond; L J W Bosch; H J Bonjer; G A Meijer; E A te Velde Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Rodrigo B Interiano; Amos H P Loh; Nathan Hinkle; Fazal N Wahid; Alpin D Malkan; Armita Bahrami; Jesse J Jenkins; Shenghua Mao; Jianrong Wu; Kimberly Proctor; Victor M Santana; Alberto S Pappo; Robert E Gold; Andrew M Davidoff Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: E J T Belt; H B A C Stockmann; G S A Abis; J M de Boer; E S M de Lange-de Klerk; M van Egmond; G A Meijer; S J Oosterling Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Sander ten Raa; Helma M U van Grevenstein; Miranda ten Kate; Kristin M Mangundap; Leo J Hofland; Hans Jeekel; Wim Sluiter; Casper H J van Eijck Journal: Cell Adh Migr Date: 2007-04-11 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Jai Young Cho; Ho-Seong Han; Yoo-Seok Yoon; Dae Wook Hwang; Kyuwhan Jung; Young Ki Kim Journal: World J Surg Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 3.352