Literature DB >> 16230565

Confocal examination of untreated fresh specimens from basal cell carcinoma: implications for microscopically guided surgery.

Armin Gerger1, Michael Horn, Silvia Koller, Wolfgang Weger, Cesare Massone, Bernd Leinweber, Helmut Kerl, Josef Smolle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of confocal examination of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) in microscopy-guided surgery.
DESIGN: Four independent observers with no previous experience in confocal laser scanning (CLS) microscopy received standardized instruction about diagnostic CLS microscopic features. Subsequently, 120 confocal images of fresh excisions from BCCs or normal skin were evaluated by each observer, imaged using a commercially available, near-infrared, reflectance CLS microscope. Logistic regression analysis was performed on a combination of all morphologic features using the forward-stepwise (Wald) method. Reliability (interobserver agreement) data were evaluated by kappa statistic.
SETTING: Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz. PATIENTS: Twenty patients with histologically verified BCC.
INTERVENTIONS: Evaluation of fresh BCC excisions by CLS microscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic accuracy of the method was evaluated by chi2 test. Diagnostic impact and reliability of each morphologic feature were evaluated by logistic regression analysis and kappa statistic, respectively.
RESULTS: Overall, high diagnostic accuracy was achieved by the 4 observers. Logistic regression analysis revealed that mainly tumor cell nuclei and tumor nests should be taken into account for diagnostic decisions, whereas disintegration of tumor cells, peripheral palisading, and retraction of stroma were rarely useful. However, most of the features were highly reliable.
CONCLUSIONS: This diagnostic validation study of CLS microscopy in microscopy-guided surgery yielded promising results and opens avenues for further studies. In the future, CLS microscopy may guide microsurgery of any skin cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16230565     DOI: 10.1001/archderm.141.10.1269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  7 in total

1.  Implementation of fluorescence confocal mosaicking microscopy by "early adopter" Mohs surgeons and dermatologists: recent progress.

Authors:  Manu Jain; Milind Rajadhyaksha; Kishwer Nehal
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Use of high-resolution confocal imaging of the vaginal epithelial microstructure to detect microbicide toxicity.

Authors:  Gracie Vargas; Tuya Shilagard; Rebecca Johnston; Brent Bell; Rachael L Stegall; Kathleen Vincent; Lawrence Stanberry; Massoud Motamedi; Nigel Bourne
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Confocal mosaicing microscopy in skin excisions: a demonstration of rapid surgical pathology.

Authors:  D S Gareau; Y G Patel; Y Li; I Aranda; A C Halpern; K S Nehal; M Rajadhyaksha
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 4.  In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy in dermatology.

Authors:  Anca L Branzan; Michael Landthaler; Rolf-Markus Szeimies
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 2.555

5.  Ex vivo confocal microscopy: an emerging technique in dermatology.

Authors:  Elisa Cinotti; Jean Luc Perrot; Bruno Labeille; Frédéric Cambazard; Pietro Rubegni
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2018-04-30

6.  Skin tumours.

Authors:  Sujay Khandpur; M Ramam
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2012-07

7.  Detection and Discrimination of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer by Multimodal Imaging.

Authors:  Sandro Heuke; Nadine Vogler; Tobias Meyer; Denis Akimov; Franziska Kluschke; Hans-Joachim Röwert-Huber; Jürgen Lademann; Benjamin Dietzek; Jürgen Popp
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2013-10-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.