BACKGROUND & AIMS: The metaplastic process in which the normal squamous epithelium of the distal esophagus is replaced by columnar-lined epithelium, known as Barrett's esophagus (BE), is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to define, analyze, and compare transcription profiles of BE, normal cardia epithelium, and squamous epithelium to gain more insight into the process of metaplasia and to identify uniquely expressed genes in these epithelia. METHODS: Serial analysis of gene expression was applied for obtaining transcription libraries of biopsy specimens taken from a BE-affected patient with intestinal type of metaplasia and from normal squamous and gastric cardia epithelia. Validation of results by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and immunoblotting was performed using tissues of 20 patients with BE. RESULTS: More than 120,000 tags were sequenced. Between BE and squamous 776, and between BE and gastric cardia 534 tags were significantly differentially expressed (P < .05, pairwise comparison). In contrast, squamous compared with gastric cardia epithelia showed significant differential expression of 1316 tags. The most up-regulated genes in BE compared with squamous epithelium were trefoil factors, annexin A10, and galectin-4. Each of the epithelia showed a unique cytokeratin expression profile. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comparison of the transcriptomes of BE, squamous epithelium, and gastric cardia epithelium. BE proves to be an incompletely differentiated type of epithelium that shows similarities to both normal squamous and gastric cardia epithelia. In addition, several uniquely expressed genes are identified. These results are a major advancement in understanding the process of metaplasia that leads to BE.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The metaplastic process in which the normal squamous epithelium of the distal esophagus is replaced by columnar-lined epithelium, known as Barrett's esophagus (BE), is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to define, analyze, and compare transcription profiles of BE, normal cardia epithelium, and squamous epithelium to gain more insight into the process of metaplasia and to identify uniquely expressed genes in these epithelia. METHODS: Serial analysis of gene expression was applied for obtaining transcription libraries of biopsy specimens taken from a BE-affected patient with intestinal type of metaplasia and from normal squamous and gastric cardia epithelia. Validation of results by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and immunoblotting was performed using tissues of 20 patients with BE. RESULTS: More than 120,000 tags were sequenced. Between BE and squamous 776, and between BE and gastric cardia 534 tags were significantly differentially expressed (P < .05, pairwise comparison). In contrast, squamous compared with gastric cardia epithelia showed significant differential expression of 1316 tags. The most up-regulated genes in BE compared with squamous epithelium were trefoil factors, annexin A10, and galectin-4. Each of the epithelia showed a unique cytokeratin expression profile. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comparison of the transcriptomes of BE, squamous epithelium, and gastric cardia epithelium. BE proves to be an incompletely differentiated type of epithelium that shows similarities to both normal squamous and gastric cardia epithelia. In addition, several uniquely expressed genes are identified. These results are a major advancement in understanding the process of metaplasia that leads to BE.
Authors: Panteleimon Kountourakis; Jaffer A Ajani; Marta Davila; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Julie G Izzo Journal: Gastrointest Cancer Res Date: 2012-03
Authors: Jerzy Ostrowski; Michal Mikula; Jakub Karczmarski; Tymon Rubel; Lucjan S Wyrwicz; Piotr Bragoszewski; Pawel Gaj; Michal Dadlez; Eugeniusz Butruk; Jaroslaw Regula Journal: J Mol Med (Berl) Date: 2007-03-30 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Willem A Dijckmeester; Bas P L Wijnhoven; David I Watson; Mary P Leong; Michael Z Michael; George C Mayne; Tim Bright; David Astill; Damian J Hussey Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2009-02-04 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Cameron M Smith; David I Watson; Mary P Leong; George C Mayne; Michael Z Michael; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Damian J Hussey Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2011-02-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Alvarez Hector; Elizabeth A Montgomery; Collins Karikari; Marcia Canto; Kerry B Dunbar; Jean S Wang; Georg Feldmann; Seung-Mo Hong; Michael C Haffner; Alan K Meeker; Sacha J Holland; Jiaxin Yu; Thilo J Heckrodt; Jing Zhang; Pingyu Ding; Dane Goff; Rajinder Singh; Juan Carlos Roa; Arivusudar Marimuthu; Gregory J Riggins; James R Eshleman; Barry D Nelkin; Akhilesh Pandey; Anirban Maitra Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2010-11-15 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Romy E Verbeek; Peter D Siersema; Fiebo J Ten Kate; Kees Fluiter; Rhonda F Souza; Frank P Vleggaar; Pauline Bus; Jantine W P M van Baal Journal: J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-08-17 Impact factor: 7.527