Literature DB >> 16229941

Common fragile sites.

Thomas W Glover1.   

Abstract

Common fragile sites are regions showing site-specific gaps and breaks on metaphase chromosomes after partial inhibition of DNA synthesis. Common fragile sites are normally stable in somatic cells. However, following treatment of cultured cells with replication inhibitors, fragile sites display gaps, breaks, rearrangements and other features of unstable DNA. Studies showing that fragile sites and associated genes are frequently deleted or rearranged in many cancer cells have clearly demonstrated their importance in genome instability in cancer. Until recently, little was known about the molecular nature and mechanisms involved in fragile site instability. From studies conducted in many laboratories, it is now known that fragile sites extend over large regions, are associated with genes, exhibit delayed replication, and contain regions of high DNA flexibility. Recent findings from our laboratory showing that the key cell cycle checkpoint genes are important for genome stability at fragile sties have shed new light on these mechanisms and on the significance of these sites in cancer and normal chromosome structure. Since their discovery over two decades ago, much has been learned regarding their significance in chromosome structure and instability in cancer, but a number of key questions remain, including why these sites are 'fragile' and the impact of this instability on associated genes in cancer cells. These and other questions have been addressed by participants of this meeting, which highlighted instability at common fragile sites. This brief review is intended to provide background on common fragile sites that has led up to many of the studies presented in the accompanying reports in this volume and not to summarize the findings presented therein. Some aspects of this review were taken from Glover et al. (T.W. Glover, M.F. Arlt, A.M. Casper, S.G. Durkin, Mechanisms of common fragile site instability, Hum. Molec. Genet. 14 (in press). [1]).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16229941     DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.08.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Lett        ISSN: 0304-3835            Impact factor:   8.679


  62 in total

1.  CBFB and MYH11 in inv(16)(p13q22) of acute myeloid leukemia displaying close spatial proximity in interphase nuclei of human hematopoietic stem cells.

Authors:  Allison B Weckerle; Madhumita Santra; Maggie C Y Ng; Patrick P Koty; Yuh-Hwa Wang
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  Frequent attenuation of the WWOX tumor suppressor in osteosarcoma is associated with increased tumorigenicity and aberrant RUNX2 expression.

Authors:  Kyle C Kurek; Sara Del Mare; Zaidoun Salah; Suhaib Abdeen; Hussain Sadiq; Suk-Hee Lee; Eugenio Gaudio; Nicola Zanesi; Kevin B Jones; Barry DeYoung; Gail Amir; Mark Gebhardt; Matthew Warman; Gary S Stein; Janet L Stein; Jane B Lian; Rami I Aqeilan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Genomic rearrangements at the FRA2H common fragile site frequently involve non-homologous recombination events across LTR and L1(LINE) repeats.

Authors:  Lena M Brueckner; Evgeny Sagulenko; Elisa M Hess; Diana Zheglo; Anne Blumrich; Manfred Schwab; Larissa Savelyeva
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Decondensation of chromosomal 45S rDNA sites in Lolium and Festuca genotypes does not result in karyotype instability.

Authors:  Laiane Corsini Rocha; Maja Jankowska; Joerg Fuchs; Andréa Mittelmann; Vânia Helena Techio; Andreas Houben
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.356

Review 5.  Global regulation of genome duplication in eukaryotes: an overview from the epifluorescence microscope.

Authors:  John Herrick; Aaron Bensimon
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Visualization by atomic force microscopy and FISH of the 45S rDNA gaps in mitotic chromosomes of Lolium perenne.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Lu Ma; Sriram Sundararajan; Shui-zhang Fei; Lijia Li
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 3.356

Review 7.  The Yin and Yang of R-loop biology.

Authors:  Lorenzo Costantino; Douglas Koshland
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 8.382

8.  Divergent patterns of breakpoint reuse in Muroid rodents.

Authors:  E E Mlynarski; C J Obergfell; M J O'Neill; R J O'Neill
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 2.957

9.  Inactivation of the Wwox gene accelerates forestomach tumor progression in vivo.

Authors:  Rami I Aqeilan; John P Hagan; Haifa A Aqeilan; Flavia Pichiorri; Louise Y Y Fong; Carlo M Croce
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Chromosome breakages associated with 45S ribosomal DNA sequences in spotted snakehead fish Channa punctatus.

Authors:  Mamta Singh; Anindya Sundar Barman
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.