K Münster1, L Schmidt, P Helm. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Herlev Hospital University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the current epidemiology of menstrual patterns among women of fertile age. DESIGN: Cross-sectional postal questionnaire study. SETTING: County of Copenhagen, Denmark. SUBJECTS: 3743 women, aged 15-44, selected at random from a Danish county, who were asked to provide information on menstrual pattern during the preceding year, 1981. The response rate was 78%. Information from non-responders was obtained via telephone interviews. RESULTS: In women with regular menstrual cycles, the 5th-95th centile range of usual cycle length decreased from 23-35 days in the 15-19 years age group to 23-30 days in the 40-44 years age group. Only 0.5% of regular menstruating women had a usual cycle length of less than 21 days and 0.9% had a usual cycle length of greater than 35 days. At least one cycle length of less than 21 days was experienced by 18.6%, whereas 29.5% had at least one cycle of greater than 35 days. Menstrual cycle variation of greater than 14 days was present in 29.3% of all women. Cycle length variation of greater than 14 days was 2.7 times more frequent in women from lower social groups (controlled by age). CONCLUSION: The study confirmed the normally used definitions of polymenorrhoea (cycle length less than 21 days) and oligomenorrhoea (cycle length between 36 and 90 days), as these very short or long menstrual cycle lengths were very seldom recorded for a longer period. However, the high frequency in a normal population of large menstrual cycle length variation challenges the view that an intra-individual variation of greater than 5 days should be regarded as a sign of disease in the woman.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the current epidemiology of menstrual patterns among women of fertile age. DESIGN: Cross-sectional postal questionnaire study. SETTING: County of Copenhagen, Denmark. SUBJECTS: 3743 women, aged 15-44, selected at random from a Danish county, who were asked to provide information on menstrual pattern during the preceding year, 1981. The response rate was 78%. Information from non-responders was obtained via telephone interviews. RESULTS: In women with regular menstrual cycles, the 5th-95th centile range of usual cycle length decreased from 23-35 days in the 15-19 years age group to 23-30 days in the 40-44 years age group. Only 0.5% of regular menstruating women had a usual cycle length of less than 21 days and 0.9% had a usual cycle length of greater than 35 days. At least one cycle length of less than 21 days was experienced by 18.6%, whereas 29.5% had at least one cycle of greater than 35 days. Menstrual cycle variation of greater than 14 days was present in 29.3% of all women. Cycle length variation of greater than 14 days was 2.7 times more frequent in women from lower social groups (controlled by age). CONCLUSION: The study confirmed the normally used definitions of polymenorrhoea (cycle length less than 21 days) and oligomenorrhoea (cycle length between 36 and 90 days), as these very short or long menstrual cycle lengths were very seldom recorded for a longer period. However, the high frequency in a normal population of large menstrual cycle length variation challenges the view that an intra-individual variation of greater than 5 days should be regarded as a sign of disease in the woman.
Authors: Joachim Alfer; Amir Fattahi; Nathalie Bleisinger; JÜrgen Krieg; Rolf Behrens; Ralf Dittrich; Matthias W Beckmann; Arndt Hartmann; Irmgard Classen-Linke; Roxana M Popovici Journal: In Vivo Date: 2020 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Lauren A Wise; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Kenneth J Rothman; Anders H Riis; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Krista F Huybrechts; Elizabeth E Hatch Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Kayla M Joyce; Kimberley P Good; Philip Tibbo; Jocelyn Brown; Sherry H Stewart Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: G Lambert-Messerlian; M B Roberts; S S Urlacher; J Ah-Ching; S Viali; M Urbanek; S T McGarvey Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: F Ouyang; X Wang; L Arguelles; L L Rosul; S A Venners; C Chen; Y-H Hsu; H Terwedow; D Wu; G Tang; J Yang; H Xing; T Zang; B Wang; X Xu Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2006-09-21 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: David Cantonwine; John D Meeker; Howard Hu; Brisa N Sánchez; Héctor Lamadrid-Figueroa; Adriana Mercado-García; Gamola Z Fortenberry; Antonia M Calafat; Martha Maria Téllez-Rojo Journal: Environ Health Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Wendy van Dorp; Renée L Mulder; Leontien C M Kremer; Melissa M Hudson; Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink; Marleen H van den Berg; Jennifer M Levine; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder; Natascia di Iorgi; Assunta Albanese; Saro H Armenian; Smita Bhatia; Louis S Constine; Andreas Corrias; Rebecca Deans; Uta Dirksen; Clarisa R Gracia; Lars Hjorth; Leah Kroon; Cornelis B Lambalk; Wendy Landier; Gill Levitt; Alison Leiper; Lillian Meacham; Alesandro Mussa; Sebastian J Neggers; Kevin C Oeffinger; Alberto Revelli; Hanneke M van Santen; Roderick Skinner; Andrew Toogood; William H Wallace; Riccardo Haupt Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hilary K Whitham; Richard F Maclehose; Bernard L Harlow; Melissa F Wellons; Pamela J Schreiner Journal: Maturitas Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 4.342