Literature DB >> 16229029

Dental arch asymmetry in an isolated Adriatic community.

Katrin Schaefer1, Tomislav Lauc, Philipp Mitteroecker, Philipp Gunz, Fred L Bookstein.   

Abstract

Developmental stability reflects the ability of a genotype to develop in the same way under varying environmental conditions. Deviations from developmental stability, arising from disruptive effects of environmental and genetic stresses, can be measured in terms of fluctuating asymmetry, a particularly sensitive indicator of the ability to cope with these stresses during ontogeny. In an inbred Adriatic island population, we expected dental arch fluctuating asymmetry 1) to be higher than in an outbred sample from the same island, and 2) within this population, to increase with the level of inbreeding. Due to environmental stress, we also expected to find higher fluctuating asymmetry in the outbred island population than in an urban reference group from the same country. The material consisted of 506 dental casts of 253 children from 1) the island of Hvar, and 2) Zagreb, Croatia. Three-dimensional coordinates of 26 landmarks spanning the arches were digitized. The analysis partitioned the asymmetry of arch forms into components for directional and fluctuating bilateral asymmetry, using the appropriate Procrustes method (geometric morphometrics). The results corroborated the hypotheses. Fluctuating asymmetry was found to be higher on the island than in Zagreb in all groups and in both jaws, and increased significantly with endogamy level in the lower jaw. There was no significant directional asymmetry in the Zagreb sample and likewise none in the upper jaws of the outbred island group, but significant directional asymmetry in both jaws of the inbred population and also in the lower jaws of the outbred island group. These results suggest an environmental as well as a genetic influence on dental arch asymmetry. Although the lower jaws expressed these two stresses almost additively, the upper jaws appeared to be better buffered. The role of directional asymmetry as a potential indicator of craniofacial developmental instability clearly merits further attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16229029     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  13 in total

1.  Sexual dimorphism in multiple aspects of 3D facial symmetry and asymmetry defined by spatially dense geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Peter Claes; Mark Walters; Mark D Shriver; David Puts; Greg Gibson; John Clement; Gareth Baynam; Geert Verbeke; Dirk Vandermeulen; Paul Suetens
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Analysis of facial skeletal asymmetry during foetal development using μCT imaging.

Authors:  Motoki Katsube; Sara M Rolfe; Stephanie R Bortolussi; Yutaka Yamaguchi; Joy M Richman; Shigehito Yamada; Siddharth R Vora
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Anatomical similarity between the Sost-knockout mouse and sclerosteosis in humans.

Authors:  Uwe Y Schwarze; Toni Dobsak; Reinhard Gruber; Fred L Bookstein
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Phylogenetic, ecological and intraindividual variability patterns in grass phytolith shape.

Authors:  Kristýna Hošková; Jiří Neustupa; Petr Pokorný; Adéla Pokorná
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 5.  Does geometric morphometrics serve the needs of plasticity research?

Authors:  Katrin Schaefer; Fred L Bookstein
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Prenatal alcohol exposure alters the patterns of facial asymmetry.

Authors:  C P Klingenberg; L Wetherill; J Rogers; E Moore; R Ward; I Autti-Rämö; A Fagerlund; S W Jacobson; L K Robinson; H E Hoyme; S N Mattson; T K Li; E P Riley; T Foroud
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.405

7.  Patterns of morphological integration in the dental arches of individuals with malocclusion.

Authors:  Steven F Miller; Kaci C Vela; Steven M Levy; Thomas E Southard; David G Gratton; Lina M Moreno Uribe
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 1.937

8.  Facial masculinity: how the choice of measurement method enables to detect its influence on behaviour.

Authors:  Santiago Sanchez-Pages; Claudia Rodriguez-Ruiz; Enrique Turiegano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Trustworthy-looking face meets brown eyes.

Authors:  Karel Kleisner; Lenka Priplatova; Peter Frost; Jaroslav Flegr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Variation at genes influencing facial morphology are not associated with developmental imprecision in human faces.

Authors:  Sonja Windhager; Helmut Schaschl; Katrin Schaefer; Philipp Mitteroecker; Susanne Huber; Bernard Wallner; Martin Fieder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.