Literature DB >> 16228621

Pharmaceutical policy and the lay public.

Janine M Traulsen1, Anna Birna Almarsdóttir.   

Abstract

Almost every national and supranational health policy document accords high importance to the need to listen to and 'empower' patients. The relationship between pharmaceutical policy and the lay public is not direct but mediated by several actors, including health care workers, patient organisations, industry and, most recently, the media. Although the overall aim of health and pharmaceutical policy is to address the needs of all citizens, there are only a few, well organised groups who are actually consulted and involved in the policymaking process, often with the support of the industry. The reasons for this lack of citizen involvement in health and pharmaceutical policymaking are many, for example: there is no consensus about what public involvement means; there is a predominance of special interest groups with narrow, specific agendas; not all decision makers welcome lay participation; patients and professionals have different rationalities with regard to their views on medicine. Because the lay public and medicine users are not one entity, one of the many challenges facing policy makers today is to identify, incorporate and prioritise the many diverse needs. The authors recommend research which includes studies that look at: lay attitudes towards pharmaceutical policy; lay experiences of drug therapy and how it affects their daily lives; the problem of identifying lay representatives; the relationship between industry and the consumers; the effect of the media on medicine users and on pharmaceutical policy itself. The authors acknowledge that although lay involvement in policy is still in its infancy, some patient organisations have been successful and there are developments towards increased lay involvement in pharmaceutical policymaking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16228621     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-005-8512-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm World Sci        ISSN: 0928-1231


  14 in total

1.  Democracy, technocracy, and the secret state of medicines control: expert and nonexpert perspectives.

Authors:  John Abraham; Julie Sheppard
Journal:  Sci Technol Human Values       Date:  1997

2.  The US and European regulatory systems: a comparison.

Authors:  Kathy Redmond
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2004 Apr-Jun

3.  The fast track: federal agencies and the political demand for AIDS drugs.

Authors:  C H Foreman
Journal:  Brookings Rev       Date:  1991

4.  From "happiness pills" to "national nightmare": changing cultural assessment of minor tranquilizers in America, 1955-1980.

Authors:  S L Speaker
Journal:  J Hist Med Allied Sci       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.088

5.  Cultural and medical attitudes toward benzodiazepines: conflicting metaphors.

Authors:  J P Morgan
Journal:  J Psychoactive Drugs       Date:  1983 Jan-Jun

6.  Stigma as a barrier to recovery: Perceived stigma and patient-rated severity of illness as predictors of antidepressant drug adherence.

Authors:  J A Sirey; M L Bruce; G S Alexopoulos; D A Perlick; S J Friedman; B S Meyers
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  A lay prescription for tailor-made drugs--focus group reflections on pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Anna Birna Almarsdóttir; Ingunn Björnsdóttir; Janine Morgall Traulsen
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Compliance and acceptance in antidepressant treatment.

Authors:  K Demyttenaere
Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.812

9.  Embodied health movements: new approaches to social movements in health.

Authors:  Phil Brown; Stephen Zavestoski; Sabrina McCormick; Brian Mayer; Rachel Morello-Frosch; Rebecca Gasior Altman
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2004-01

10.  How does direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) affect prescribing? A survey in primary care environments with and without legal DTCA.

Authors:  Barbara Mintzes; Morris L Barer; Richard L Kravitz; Ken Bassett; Joel Lexchin; Arminée Kazanjian; Robert G Evans; Richard Pan; Stephen A Marion
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-09-02       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  7 in total

1.  Public perceptions of ethical issues regarding adult predictive genetic testing.

Authors:  Douglas K Martin; Heather L Greenwood; Jeff Nisker
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2009-03-14

2.  Public engagement in setting priorities in health care.

Authors:  Rebecca A Bruni; Andreas Laupacis; Douglas K Martin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Advertising and disclosure of funding on patient organisation websites: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Douglas E Ball; Klara Tisocki; Andrew Herxheimer
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Adherence to treatment: practice, education and research in Danish community pharmacy.

Authors:  Lotte S Haugbølle; Hanne Herborg
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2009-03-15

5.  Social media for dissemination and public engagement in neurosurgery-the example of Brainbook.

Authors:  A Alamri; P Rogers; C Kearns; T Doke; A Al-Habib; F Servadei; P J Hutchinson; A G Kolias; Chris Uff
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case study.

Authors:  Rebecca A Bruni; Andreas Laupacis; Wendy Levinson; Douglas K Martin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Pharmacy Customers' Experiences With Electronic Prescriptions: Cross-Sectional Survey on Nationwide Implementation in Finland.

Authors:  Elina Lämsä; Johanna Timonen; Riitta Ahonen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 5.428

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.