Literature DB >> 16228253

Parasite mediated mortality and host immune response explain age-related differences in blood parasitism in birds.

Daniel Sol1, Roger Jovani, Jordi Torres.   

Abstract

An important pattern in host-parasite assemblages is a higher intensity of parasites in juveniles than in adults, but the reasons for these differences remain obscure. Three non-mutually exclusive hypotheses have been proposed: (1) heavily parasitized juveniles die before being recruited into the adult population ('selection' hypothesis); (2) the development of an acquired immunity by the host in front of the parasite reduces the intensity of the parasite in adult hosts ('immunity' hypothesis); and (3) differences in behavior makes adults less exposed to the parasite than juveniles ('vector exposure' hypothesis). Having rejected the 'vector exposure' hypothesis in a previous study, here we tested the 'selection' and 'immunity' hypotheses in feral pigeons (Columba livia) infected by the blood parasite Haemoproteus columbae. In agreement with the 'selection' hypothesis, young (but not adult) pigeons that were highly parasitized had a lower probability of surviving until adulthood, independent of their body condition. However, selection was not strong enough to account for the observed differences in parasite intensity between age-classes, and after selection parasite intensity of survivors still remained 85% higher in juveniles than in adults. In contrast, the 'immunity' hypothesis offered a greater explanatory power. The intensity of blood parasites in young pigeons, but not in adults, decreased over time so dramatically that by the time they had become adults their intensities were indistinguishable from that typically seen in adults. Therefore, while selection against highly parasitized juveniles can contribute to some extent to a reduction in parasitism seen in the adult population, age-specific blood parasitism in feral pigeons is best explained as a transitory phase just before the host develops an effective immune response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 16228253     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1223-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  Does clutch size evolve in response to parasites and immunocompetence?

Authors:  T E Martin; A P Møller; S Merino; J Clobert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  ESTIMATING THE FORM OF NATURAL SELECTION ON A QUANTITATIVE TRAIT.

Authors:  Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS.

Authors:  Russell Lande; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Influence of blood parasites on the body mass of passeriform birds.

Authors:  G F Bennett; J R Caines; M A Bishop
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.535

5.  Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites?

Authors:  W D Hamilton; M Zuk
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-10-22       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Measurement of malarial infectivity of human populations to mosquitoes in the Madang area, Papua, New Guinea.

Authors:  P M Graves; T R Burkot; R Carter; J A Cattani; M Lagog; J Parker; B J Brabin; F D Gibson; D J Bradley; M P Alpers
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.234

  6 in total
  40 in total

1.  Parasites suppress immune-enhancing effect of methionine in nestling great tits.

Authors:  Michèle Wegmann; Beatrice Voegeli; Heinz Richner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  How predictable is the abundance of double gametocyte infections?

Authors:  Roger Jovani; Daniel Sol
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Ectoparasites and age-dependent survival in a desert rodent.

Authors:  Hadas Hawlena; Zvika Abramsky; Boris R Krasnov
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Prevalence of blood parasites in eastern versus Western house finches: are eastern birds resistant to infection?

Authors:  Andrew K Davis; Wendy R Hood; Geoffrey E Hill
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.184

5.  Biogeographical patterns and co-occurrence of pathogenic infection across island populations of Berthelot's pipit (Anthus berthelotii).

Authors:  Lewis G Spurgin; Juan Carlos Illera; David P Padilla; David S Richardson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Associations between malaria and MHC genes in a migratory songbird.

Authors:  Helena Westerdahl; Jonas Waldenström; Bengt Hansson; Dennis Hasselquist; Torbjörn von Schantz; Staffan Bensch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Determinants of prevalence and co-infestation by ecto- and endoparasites in the Atlas day gecko, Quedenfeldtia trachyblepharus, an endemic species of Morocco.

Authors:  Omar Er-Rguibi; El-Mustapha Laghzaoui; Abdessamad Aglagane; Latifa Kimdil; Abdelaziz Abbad; El Hassan El Mouden
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.289

8.  Molecular characterization of avian malaria in the spotless starling (Sturnus unicolor).

Authors:  Jaime Muriel; Jeff A Graves; Diego Gil; S Magallanes; Concepción Salaberria; Miriam Casal-López; Alfonso Marzal
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 2.289

9.  Hemosporidian blood parasites in seabirds--a comparative genetic study of species from Antarctic to tropical habitats.

Authors:  Petra Quillfeldt; Javier Martínez; Janos Hennicke; Katrin Ludynia; Anja Gladbach; Juan F Masello; Samuel Riou; Santiago Merino
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2010-07-23

10.  Screening for several potential pathogens in feral pigeons (Columba livia) in Madrid.

Authors:  Belén Vázquez; Fernando Esperón; Elena Neves; Juan López; Carlos Ballesteros; María Jesús Muñoz
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 1.695

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.