STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, long-term follow-up study. OBJECTIVES: To find out whether incidental durotomy in lumbar disc surgery is associated with long-term sequelae. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Incidental durotomy is a frequent complication during spinal surgery. Little is known about the clinical long-term outcome. METHODS: The study population comprised 1,280 patients who underwent standard discectomy of a lumbar disc herniation. A total of 41 patients with incidental durotomies (Group A) were compared with a control group (n = 41) (Group B) matched for age, sex, spinal level, and duration of follow-up. After a mean follow-up period of 10.2 years (Group A) or 10.3 years (Group B), the patients reported complaints, headache, and low back or leg pain. The patients' activity was assessed by means of a questionnaire concerning hindrance in daily activities, the Tegner score for general activities in daily life, and the Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire for Measuring Back Pain-Related Functional Limitations (FFbH-R). The frequency of reoperation and the intake of analgesics were included. Furthermore, the patients' inability to work, change of profession, and retirement were registered. RESULTS: Patients with incidental durotomy had a poorer outcome after surgery. The Tegner score was significantly decreased for the group with dural tears. Furthermore, significant more patients with incidental durotomy complained about headaches after surgery. A strong tendency for worse outcome in Group A was shown in regard to reported complaints and daily activity. The patients with incidental durotomy had a tendency to more reoperations, a longer duration of inability to work, more back-pain, and functional limitations related to back-pain (FFbH-R). CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that incidental durotomy in lumbar disc surgery was associated with long-term clinical sequelae. We therefore conclude that dural tears bring about poor clinical outcome at the long-term follow-up.
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, long-term follow-up study. OBJECTIVES: To find out whether incidental durotomy in lumbar disc surgery is associated with long-term sequelae. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Incidental durotomy is a frequent complication during spinal surgery. Little is known about the clinical long-term outcome. METHODS: The study population comprised 1,280 patients who underwent standard discectomy of a lumbar disc herniation. A total of 41 patients with incidental durotomies (Group A) were compared with a control group (n = 41) (Group B) matched for age, sex, spinal level, and duration of follow-up. After a mean follow-up period of 10.2 years (Group A) or 10.3 years (Group B), the patients reported complaints, headache, and low back or leg pain. The patients' activity was assessed by means of a questionnaire concerning hindrance in daily activities, the Tegner score for general activities in daily life, and the Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire for Measuring Back Pain-Related Functional Limitations (FFbH-R). The frequency of reoperation and the intake of analgesics were included. Furthermore, the patients' inability to work, change of profession, and retirement were registered. RESULTS:Patients with incidental durotomy had a poorer outcome after surgery. The Tegner score was significantly decreased for the group with dural tears. Furthermore, significant more patients with incidental durotomy complained about headaches after surgery. A strong tendency for worse outcome in Group A was shown in regard to reported complaints and daily activity. The patients with incidental durotomy had a tendency to more reoperations, a longer duration of inability to work, more back-pain, and functional limitations related to back-pain (FFbH-R). CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that incidental durotomy in lumbar disc surgery was associated with long-term clinical sequelae. We therefore conclude that dural tears bring about poor clinical outcome at the long-term follow-up.
Authors: Christian Herren; Rolf Sobottke; Anne F Mannion; Thomas Zweig; Everard Munting; Philippe Otten; Tim Pigott; Jan Siewe; Emin Aghayev Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 3.134