Literature DB >> 16227876

Surgical treatment for scoliosis in Marfan syndrome.

Mario Di Silvestre1, Tiziana Greggi, Stefano Giacomini, Alfredo Cioni, Georgios Bakaloudis, Francesco Lolli, Patrizio Parisini.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Review of results of patients with Marfan syndrome treated with instrumented posterior fusion alone for scoliosis.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results of surgical treatment for scoliosis in Marfan syndrome. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few studies have been reported in the literature on surgical treatment for scoliosis in Marfan syndrome, analyzing long-term results of posterior instrumented fusion.
METHODS: Twenty-three patients with Marfan syndrome with a mean age of 17 years (range, 11-31 years) were treated surgically from 1982 to 1995 for scoliosis, using a posterior instrumented fusion alone (Harrington rod with sublaminar wires in the first 16 cases, and a more recent hybrid instrumentation in the remaining 7 cases). All of the patients received a long posterior instrumented fusion, including 12.3 levels on average (range, 9-17), extending the fusion area to vertebrae that were neutral and stable in both coronal and sagittal planes before surgery. Patients were analyzed as two different groups (Group 1 and Group 2) according to the different posterior instrumentations employed: Group 1 included 16 patients treated by the Harrington distraction rod technique with sublaminar wires, while Group 2 included 7 patients treated using more recent hybrid instrumentations. Presentation features, complications, and results were analyzed.
RESULTS: At a minimum follow-up of 7 years (maximum, 18 years), all 23 patients were reviewed. The mean age was 26.8 years (range, 20-38 years). The average preoperative scoliosis value of 69.91 degrees was initially corrected to 38.17 degrees, averaged 40.89 degrees 1 year after surgery, and was finally equal to 44.09 degrees at the last follow-up. Differences in terms of scoliosis correction achieved with different instrumentations (Groups 1 and 2) did not reach statistical significance. In Group 2 patients, the percentage of postoperative correction was slightly lower (44.23%) than that of Group 1 (46.55%) but remained more stable at the last follow-up (40.97% vs. 36.38% of Group 1). There were 11 complications in 10 of the 23 patients (43.4%); two complications occurred in 1 patient. Intraoperatively, dural tears occurred in 2 cases (8.6%). Pseudarthrosis with instrumentation failure in 2 cases (8.6%) required revision surgery. Five (21.7%) distal hook dislodgements with moderate loss of scoliosis correction, 1 (4.3%) mild loss of correction without instrumentation failure, and 1 asymptomatic cervicothoracic junctional kyphosis. did not require surgery. All complications occurred among the 16 Group 1 patients, treated using the Harrington rod instrumentation with sublaminar wires.
CONCLUSIONS: These results seemed to demonstrate that a satisfactory stabilization of scoliosis can be achieved by posterior instrumentation alone in patients with Marfan syndrome. Instrumented posterior fusion should be extended to include vertebrae that are neutral and stable in both coronal and sagittal planes before surgery, in order to ensure stabilization of the deformity and reduce the risks of decompensation of the spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16227876     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000182317.33700.08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

1.  Surgical treatment of scoliosis in Marfan syndrome: outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Jun Qiao; Leilei Xu; Zhen Liu; Feng Zhu; Bangping Qian; Xu Sun; Zezhang Zhu; Yong Qiu; Qing Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Sagittal balance in scoliosis associated with Marfan syndrome: a stereoradiographic three-dimensional analysis.

Authors:  Yann Glard; Vincent Pomero; Patrick Collignon; Wafa Skalli; Jean-Luc Jouve; Gérard Bollini
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 1.548

3.  Scoliotic curve patterns in patients with Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Yann Glard; Franck Launay; Grégory Edgard-Rosa; Patrick Collignon; Jean-Luc Jouve; Gérard Bollini
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 1.548

4.  Complications associated with surgical repair of syndromic scoliosis.

Authors:  Benjamin J Levy; Jacob F Schulz; Eric D Fornari; Adam L Wollowick
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2015-04-23

5.  Comparison of posterior correction results between Marfan syndrome scoliosis and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis-a retrospective case-series study.

Authors:  Weiqiang Liang; Bin Yu; Yipeng Wang; Zhengyao Li; Guixing Qiu; Jianxiong Shen; Jianguo Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in patients with Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Jun Qiao; Feng Zhu; Leilei Xu; Zhen Liu; Xu Sun; Bangping Qian; Qing Jiang; Zezhang Zhu; Yong Qiu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Surgical treatment of spinal deformities in Marfan syndrome: Long-term follow-up results using different instrumentations.

Authors:  Matteo Palmisani; Eugenio Dema; Alessandro Rava; Rosa Palmisani; Massimo Girardo; Stefano Cervellati
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

8.  Correction of Scoliosis with Large Thoracic Curves in Marfan Syndrome: Does the High-Density Pedicle Screw Construct Contribute to Better Surgical Outcomes.

Authors:  Dengxu Jiang; Zhen Liu; Huang Yan; Jie Li; Changchun Tseng; Yiwen Yuan; Yong Qiu; Zezhang Zhu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-12-17

9.  A 16-Year-Old Male with Thoracic Compression following Posterior Spinal Instrumentation and Fusion for Marfan-Associated Syndromic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Mason Uvodich; Ross Barman; Adam Reitz; Matthew Sexton
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2020-12-10

10.  Sublaminar fixation versus hooks and pedicle screws in scoliosis surgery for Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Alessandro Rava; Eugenio Dema; Matteo Palmisani; Rosa Palmisani; Stefano Cervellati; Massimo Girardo
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2020-04-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.