Literature DB >> 16227071

HPLC/UV analysis of chlorfenapyr residues in cabbage and soil to study the dynamics of different formulations.

Yongsong Cao1, Jiuxin Chen, Yuelong Wang, Ji Liang, Lihua Chen, Yitong Lu.   

Abstract

The chlorfenapyr analysis method of residue, its degradation and final residue in soil and cabbage were studied. Residues of chlorfenapyr were extracted from soil and cabbage with acetone/water, purified by liquid/liquid partition and chromatographic column, concentrated to a small volume, and then determined by HPLC equipped with UV detector. The mean accuracy of analytical method were 93.3% and 90.6% in soil and cabbage, respectively; the precision (repeatability) in cabbage ranging from 1.7% to 11.8%, in soil ranging from 2.8% to 11.2%; the precision (reproducibility) in cabbage ranged from 2.2% to 12.1%, in soil it ranged from 2.4% to 11.5%. The minimum detectable amount of chlorfenapyr was 0.65 ng, the minimum detectable concentration was 0.0162 mg kg-1. The degradation of chlorfenapyr formulations in soil and cabbage was determined. The results showed that chlorfenapyr nanoformulation and suspension concentration degradation in soil coincided with C=0.2538 e-0.1612t, C=0.537 e-0.1754t, respectively; the half-lives were about 4.3 d and 3.9 d, respectively. Two kinds of chlorfenapyr formulation degradation in cabbage coincided with C=4.0431 e-0.3103t, C=6.9611 e-0.2686t respectively; the half-lives were about 2.2 d and 2.6, d, respectively. When chlorfenapyr formulations were applied according to the double recommended dose, the final residues in cabbage were much lower than the USA EPA's maximum residue limit of 1 mg kg-1 in vegetables. The degradation rate of chlorfenapyr nanoformulation was faster than that of suspension concentration, and the former residue was also less in soil. Therefore, a harvest interval should be more than 5 d, and a dosage of 900 mL/hm2 was suggested for chlorfenapyr suspension concentration, which could be considered as safe to human beings and animals. Chlorfenapyr nanoformulation was safer than suspension concentration, its harvest interval and dosage can attain a high level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16227071     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.01.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  7 in total

1.  Residue behavior and risk assessment of mixed formulation of imidacloprid and chlorfenapyr in chieh-qua under field conditions.

Authors:  Jian Xiang Huang; Cong Yun Liu; Da Hai Lu; Jia Jia Chen; Yi Cai Deng; Fu Hua Wang
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  GC-ECD analysis of S-metolachlor (Dual Gold) in cotton plant and soil in trial field.

Authors:  Pengying Cao; Fengmao Liu; Suli Wang; Yuhong Wang; Lijun Han
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Dissipation kinetics and risk assessment of chlorfenapyr on tomato and cabbage.

Authors:  Sandip Patra; Pritam Ganguly; Suhrid Ranjan Barik; Arunava Samanta
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Distinctive effects of nano-sized permethrin in the environment.

Authors:  R S Suresh Kumar; P J Shiny; C H Anjali; Jayakumar Jerobin; Katrin Margulis Goshen; Shlomo Magdassi; Amitava Mukherjee; N Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Determination of Market, Field Samples, and Dietary Risk Assessment of Chlorfenapyr and Tralopyril in 16 Crops.

Authors:  Hong Li; Fengshou Sun; Shuai Hu; Qi Sun; Nan Zou; Beixing Li; Wei Mu; Jin Lin
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-04-26

6.  Preparation and performance of chlorfenapyr microcapsules with a degradable polylactide-based polyurethane wall material.

Authors:  Linfang Zhu; Guangqi Jiang; Jun Cen; Linhuai Li
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.036

7.  In vitro larval rearing method of eusocial bumblebee Bombus terrestris for toxicity test.

Authors:  Yuto Kato; Shingo Kikuta; Seth M Barribeau; Maki N Inoue
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 4.996

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.