Literature DB >> 16226981

The management of long gap esophageal atresia.

Emmanuelle Séguier-Lipszyc1, Amand Bonnard, Sophie Aizenfisz, Goharig Enezian, Joel Maintenant, Yves Aigrain, Pascal de Lagausie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Present management of esophageal atresia has enabled the survival rate to approach 95%. Controversy remains concerning the many options for the surgical management of long gap esophageal atresia without tracheoesophageal fistula and represents the difficulty of this pathology. In the last couple of years, we have had a nonexplained outbreak of cases of long gap esophageal atresia without tracheoesophageal fistula. This article reports our experience in the management of these children.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: It is a retrospective study of all cases of long gap esophageal atresia without tracheoesophageal fistula managed in our institution since 1992, focusing on the antenatal period, delivery with weight and term, the associated malformations, the initial management, and the definitive surgery. Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Ten cases (8.7%) of long gap esophageal atresia according to Ladd's classification, 6 during the past 2 years, were taken in charge at Robert Debré Hospital between 1992 and 2002. There were 4 girls and 6 boys. Ten had a prenatal diagnosis of esophageal atresia. The average birth weight was 2496 g (range, 1400-3400 g) with an average term of 36.6-week gestation (range, 31.5-39.6). Delayed reconstruction was done in all children between 41 and 147 days of life (average of 102 days). Six had a direct anastomosis and 4 had a colonic esophagoplasty (3 with an esogastric disconnection during the same procedure). The average follow-up was 60 months (range, 27-133). There was 1 death owing to adenovirus infection at 5 years of age. Four children required a Nissen fundoplication for severe gastroesophageal reflux. At least, 2 children presented an anastomotic stricture which required pneumatic dilatations.
CONCLUSION: Treatment options for long gap esophageal atresia generally require several stages over several months. We propose, for their management, a direct anastomosis at 4 months of age whenever it is possible. If not, we use a colonic esophagoplasty with an esogastric disconnection to control the gastroesophageal reflux which is responsible for strictures and respiratory impairment and does not obstruct the aperistaltic tube.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16226981     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  12 in total

1.  Type-A long-gap esophageal atresia treated by thoracoscopic esophagoesophagostomy after sequential extrathoracic esophageal elongation (Kimura's technique).

Authors:  Go Miyano; Hiroomi Okuyama; Hiroyuki Koga; Manabu Okawada; Takashi Doi; Toshiaki Takahashi; Hiroki Nakamura; Kazuto Suda; Geoffrey J Lane; Tadaharu Okazaki; Atsuyuki Yamataka
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 2.  Delayed primary anastomosis for management of long-gap esophageal atresia: a meta-analysis of complications and long-term outcome.

Authors:  Florian Friedmacher; Prem Puri
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  In vitro development and characterization of a tissue-engineered conduit resembling esophageal wall using human and pig skeletal myoblast, oral epithelial cells, and biologic scaffolds.

Authors:  Tigran Poghosyan; Sebastien Gaujoux; Valerie Vanneaux; Patrick Bruneval; Thomas Domet; Severine Lecourt; Mohamed Jarraya; Rony Sfeir; Jerome Larghero; Pierre Cattan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 4.  Imaging of long gap esophageal atresia and the Foker process: expected findings and complications.

Authors:  Mark C Liszewski; Sigrid Bairdain; Carlo Buonomo; Russell W Jennings; George A Taylor
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-12-24

Review 5.  Current knowledge on esophageal atresia.

Authors:  Paulo Fernando Martins Pinheiro; Ana Cristina Simões e Silva; Regina Maria Pereira
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Colon interposition in children after failed tracheoesophageal fistula repair.

Authors:  Samina Park; Chang-Hyun Kang; Hye-Seon Kim; In Kyu Park; Young Tae Kim; Joo-Hyun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-12-07

7.  Comparison of outcomes according to the operation for type A esophageal atresia.

Authors:  Yeon-Ju Huh; Hyun-Young Kim; Seong-Cheol Lee; Kwi-Won Park; Sung-Eun Jung
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.859

8.  Restoring esophageal continuity following a failed colonic interposition for long-gap esophageal atresia.

Authors:  Beatrice Dionigi; Sigrid Bairdain; Charles Jason Smithers; Russell W Jennings; Thomas E Hamilton
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-04-23

9.  Outcomes of primary gastric transposition for long-gap esophageal atresia in neonates.

Authors:  Zhandong Zeng; Fengli Liu; Juan Ma; Yun Fang; Hongwei Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Repair of long-gap esophageal atresia: gastric conduits may improve outcome-a 20-year single center experience.

Authors:  Catherine J Hunter; Mikael Petrosyan; Meghan E Connelly; Henri R Ford; Nam X Nguyen
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.