Literature DB >> 16226849

Effects of temporal clumping and payoff accumulation on impulsiveness and cooperation.

David W Stephens1, Colleen M McLinn, Jeffrey R Stevens.   

Abstract

Animals show impulsiveness when they prefer a smaller more immediate option, even though a larger more delayed option produces a higher intake rate. This impulsive behavior has implications for several behavioral problems including social cooperation. This paper presents two experiments using captive blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata) that consider the effects of payoff accumulation and temporal clumping on impulsiveness and cooperation. Payoff accumulation refers to a situation where the benefits gained from each choice trial accumulate from one trial to the next, and only become available to the animal after it has completed a fixed number of trials. We hypothesized that this would reduce impulsiveness because it removes the advantage of quickly realizing food gains. Clumping refers to situation in which the animal experiences several choice trials in quick succession followed by a long pause before the next clump. We hypothesized that if payoffs accumulated over a clump of trials this would enhance the effect of accumulation. We tested the effects of accumulation and clumping on impulsiveness in a self-control situation. We found a significant interaction between clumping and accumulation. Payoff accumulation reduced impulsiveness, but only when trials were clumped. Post hoc analyses suggest that clumping alone increases impulsiveness. A second experiment applied these results to cooperation. This experiment reveals an interaction between payoff accumulation and trial's position within the clump. Jays were more likely to cooperate on the first trial of a clump, but the likelihood of cooperation dropped after the first trial. However, this drop was larger when payoffs did not accumulate. This observation suggests that the difference between accumulated and un-accumulated treatments that we reported previously may be largely due to differences in how animals behave in the first trial of a clump.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16226849     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  7 in total

1.  The Temporal Dynamics of Cooperation.

Authors:  Matthew L Locey; Howard Rachlin
Journal:  J Behav Decis Mak       Date:  2011-01-24

2.  Long-term social bonds promote cooperation in the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma.

Authors:  Angèle St-Pierre; Karine Larose; Frédérique Dubois
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Dog's discrimination of human selfish and generous attitudes: the role of individual recognition, experience, and experimenters' gender.

Authors:  Fabricio Carballo; Esteban Freidin; Natalia Putrino; Carolina Shimabukuro; Emma Casanave; Mariana Bentosela
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Impulsiveness does not prevent cooperation from emerging but reduces its occurrence: an experiment with zebra finches.

Authors:  Camille Chia; Frédérique Dubois
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Psychosocial Stress, Epileptic-Like Symptoms and Psychotic Experiences.

Authors:  Petr Bob; Tereza Petraskova Touskova; Ondrej Pec; Jiri Raboch; Nash Boutros; Paul Lysaker
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-14

6.  Cognitive and motivational requirements for the emergence of cooperation in a rat social game.

Authors:  Duarte S Viana; Isabel Gordo; Elio Sucena; Marta A P Moita
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  High mutual cooperation rates in rats learning reciprocal altruism: The role of payoff matrix.

Authors:  Guillermo E Delmas; Sergio E Lew; B Silvano Zanutto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.