Literature DB >> 16226819

Arousal and valence effects on event-related P3a and P3b during emotional categorization.

Sylvain Delplanque1, Laetitia Silvert, Pascal Hot, Simon Rigoulot, Henrique Sequeira.   

Abstract

Due to the adaptive value of emotional situations, categorizing along the valence dimension may be supported by critical brain functions. The present study examined emotion-cognition relationships by focusing on the influence of an emotional categorization task on the cognitive processing induced by an oddball-like paradigm. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from subjects explicitly asked to categorize along the valence dimension (unpleasant, neutral or pleasant) deviant target pictures embedded in a train of standard stimuli. Late positivities evoked in response to the target pictures were decomposed into a P3a and a P3b and topographical differences were observed according to the valence content of the stimuli. P3a showed enhanced amplitudes at posterior sites in response to unpleasant pictures as compared to both neutral and pleasant pictures. This effect is interpreted as a negativity bias related to attentional processing. The P3b component was sensitive to the arousal value of the stimulation, with higher amplitudes at several posterior sites for both types of emotional pictures. Moreover, unpleasant pictures evoked smaller amplitudes than pleasant ones at fronto-central sites. Thus, the context updating process may be differentially modulated by the affective arousal and valence of the stimulus. The present study supports the assumption that, during an emotional categorization, the emotional content of the stimulus may modulate the reorientation of attention and the subsequent updating process in a specific way.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16226819     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  46 in total

1.  The effects of stimulus complexity on the preattentive processing of self-generated and nonself voices: An ERP study.

Authors:  Tatiana Conde; Óscar F Gonçalves; Ana P Pinheiro
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Affective visual event-related potentials: arousal, repetition, and time-on-task.

Authors:  Jonas K Olofsson; John Polich
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 3.251

3.  Affective visual event-related potentials: arousal, valence, and repetition effects for normal and distorted pictures.

Authors:  Bella Rozenkrants; Jonas K Olofsson; John Polich
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2007-11-04       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 4.  Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings.

Authors:  Jonas K Olofsson; Steven Nordin; Henrique Sequeira; John Polich
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Electrophysiological differences in the processing of affective information in words and pictures.

Authors:  José A Hinojosa; Luis Carretié; María A Valcárcel; Constantino Méndez-Bértolo; Miguel A Pozo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Feature-specific attention allocation overrules the orienting response to emotional stimuli.

Authors:  Tom Everaert; Adriaan Spruyt; Valentina Rossi; Gilles Pourtois; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Conflict Processing is Modulated by Positive Emotion Word Type in Second Language: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Chenggang Wu; Juan Zhang
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-10

8.  Acute stress and event-related potential correlates of attention to alcohol images in social drinkers.

Authors:  Natalie A Ceballos; Ryan J Giuliano; Nicole Y Y Wicha; Reiko Graham
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.582

9.  Using ERPs to investigate valence processing in the affect misattribution procedure.

Authors:  Curtis D Von Gunten; Bruce D Bartholow; Laura D Scherer
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Are females more responsive to emotional stimuli? A neurophysiological study across arousal and valence dimensions.

Authors:  C Lithari; C A Frantzidis; C Papadelis; Ana B Vivas; M A Klados; C Kourtidou-Papadeli; C Pappas; A A Ioannides; P D Bamidis
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.