Literature DB >> 16226793

Abiotic methylation of mercury in the aquatic environment.

Valbona Celo1, David R S Lean, Susannah L Scott.   

Abstract

Methylation of inorganic mercury in the aquatic environment has been considered to be largely the result of biological processes, primarily involving sulfate-reducing bacteria. However, these processes cannot account for all of the methylmercury that is formed naturally. A growing body of evidence suggests that chemical reactions represent another possible pathway for mercury methylation in the aquatic environment. In order to assess the abiotic contribution to mercury methylation in the water column, and specifically the conditions under which this contribution may be significant, the current state of knowledge about environmentally significant methylation reactions is reviewed. Results of our laboratory-based investigations of aqueous mercury reactions with some potential methyl donors, including MeCo(dmg)(2)(H2O), a simple model for methylcobalamin, various methyltin compounds and methyl iodide, are presented. In each reaction, the yield of methylmercury and the rate of methylation depend strongly on environmental factors such as pH, temperature, and the presence of complexing agents, especially chloride.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16226793     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.09.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  19 in total

1.  Assessing exposure risks for freshwater tilapia species posed by mercury and methylmercury.

Authors:  Yi-Hsien Cheng; Yi-Jun Lin; Shu-Han You; Ying-Fei Yang; Chun Ming How; Yi-Ting Tseng; Wei-Yu Chen; Chung-Min Liao
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Microbial mercury methylation in Antarctic sea ice.

Authors:  Caitlin M Gionfriddo; Michael T Tate; Ryan R Wick; Mark B Schultz; Adam Zemla; Michael P Thelen; Robyn Schofield; David P Krabbenhoft; Kathryn E Holt; John W Moreau
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 17.745

3.  Mercury in the Mediterranean, part I: spatial and temporal trends.

Authors:  Jože Kotnik; Francesca Sprovieri; Nives Ogrinc; Milena Horvat; Nicola Pirrone
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Periphyton and Flocculent Materials Are Important Ecological Compartments Supporting Abundant and Diverse Mercury Methylator Assemblages in the Florida Everglades.

Authors:  Hee-Sung Bae; Forrest E Dierberg; Andrew Ogram
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Fate and transport of mercury in environmental media and human exposure.

Authors:  Moon-Kyung Kim; Kyung-Duk Zoh
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2012-11-29

6.  Ruditapes philippinarum and Ruditapes decussatus under Hg environmental contamination.

Authors:  Cátia Velez; Petrus Galvão; Renan Longo; Olaf Malm; Amadeu M V M Soares; Etelvina Figueira; Rosa Freitas
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Mercury in breeding and wintering Nelson's Sparrows (Ammodramus nelsoni).

Authors:  V L Winder; S D Emslie
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Calls to Florida Poison Control Centers about mercury: Trends over 2003-2013.

Authors:  Matthew O Gribble; Aniruddha Deshpande; Wendy B Stephan; Candis M Hunter; Richard S Weisman
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 6.498

9.  Expanded Diversity and Phylogeny of mer Genes Broadens Mercury Resistance Paradigms and Reveals an Origin for MerA Among Thermophilic Archaea.

Authors:  Christos A Christakis; Tamar Barkay; Eric S Boyd
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Mercury vapor release from broken compact fluorescent lamps and in situ capture by new nanomaterial sorbents.

Authors:  Natalie C Johnson; Shawn Manchester; Love Sarin; Yuming Gao; Indrek Kulaots; Robert H Hurt
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.