Literature DB >> 16226686

Screening for breast cancer.

Stephen W Duffy1, Robert A Smith, Rhian Gabe, László Tabár, Amy M F Yen, Tony H H Chen.   

Abstract

Strong evidence supports the value of breast cancer screening with mammography, and high-quality mammography screening can be considered a major public health achievement. As noted earlier in the discussion about the evaluation of service screening, the group of women who did not participate in mammographic screening in the decades after screening had been introduced had essentially unchanged or only minor improvements in mortality compared with the pattern before the introduction of screening, despite widespread use of adjuvant chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. Breast cancer should be treated in its preclinical phase if we are to save the lives of women with this disease, and a considerable body of evidence outlines best practices that, with broader adherence, would result in greater breast cancer mortality reductions than have been observed to date.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16226686     DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2005.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am        ISSN: 1055-3207            Impact factor:   3.495


  5 in total

1.  Outcomes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma screening for high risk family members in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Wai Tong Ng; Cheuk Wai Choi; Michael C H Lee; Lai Yau Law; Tsz Kok Yau; Anne W M Lee
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  A multilevel investigation of inequalities in clinical and psychosocial outcomes for women after breast cancer.

Authors:  Philippa H Youl; Peter D Baade; Joanne F Aitken; Suzanne K Chambers; Gavin Turrell; Christopher Pyke; Jeffrey Dunn
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Textural classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns with the SONNET Selforganizing neural network.

Authors:  Daniel Howard; Simon C Roberts; Conor Ryan; Adrian Brezulianu
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2008

4.  Quantitative evaluation of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM) for differential diagnosis and grading prediction of benign and malignant breast lesions.

Authors:  Xijin Mao; Xuexue Zou; Ning Yu; Xingyu Jiang; Jing Du
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Effective x-ray attenuation coefficient measurements from two full field digital mammography systems for data calibration applications.

Authors:  John J Heine; Jerry A Thomas
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.819

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.