Literature DB >> 16226170

Application of evidence-based medical therapy is associated with improved outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention and is a valid quality indicator.

Wissam A Jaber1, Ryan J Lennon, Verghese Mathew, David R Holmes, Amir Lerman, Charanjit S Rihal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether the prescription of evidence-based medications at discharge after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can predict long-term clinical outcome.
BACKGROUND: The association of standard-of-care drug utilization and long-term mortality and morbidity after PCI is not well studied.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of successful PCI procedures performed on 7,745 patients between March 1, 1998, and December 31, 2004. Discharge medications were analyzed, and a medication score (MEDS) was developed. A MEDS of 1 was assigned for each of the following medication classes: 1) antiplatelet, 2) lipid-lowering, 3) beta-blocker, and 4) angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. The outcomes measured were long-term death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization.
RESULTS: Patients with MEDS of 3 to 4 had higher-risk profiles based upon standard clinical and angiographic criteria. Despite this, at a median follow-up of 36 months, patients with a MEDS of 3 or 4 were at lower risk of death than those with a MEDS of 0 or 1 (8.9%, 7.5%, and 13% for MEDS of 4, 3, and 0 to 1, respectively; p = 0.014). After adjustment for covariates, a MEDS of 3 to 4 was associated with significantly lower mortality or myocardial infarction in follow-up than a MEDS of 0 to 1 (hazard ratios of 0.72 and 0.67 for MEDS of 3 and 4, respectively; p < 0.01). There was no association between MEDS and target vessel revascularization.
CONCLUSIONS: After successful PCI, the use of multiple evidence-based classes of cardiovascular medications--antiplatelet, lipid-lowering, beta-blockers, and ACE inhibitors--is associated with improved outcome free of death or MI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16226170     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.06.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  12 in total

1.  Inadequate medical treatment of patients with coronary artery disease by primary care physicians in Germany.

Authors:  B Bischoff; Sigmund Silber; B M Richartz; L Pieper; J Klotsche; H-U Wittchen
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Percutaneous coronary interventions in facilities without cardiac surgery on site.

Authors:  Yuri B Pride; C Michael Gibson
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  An optimal cardiothoracic ratio cut-off to predict clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Seung Jin Jun; Hae Chang Jeong; Yo Han Ku; Seong Ahn; Keun Ho Park; Doo Sun Sim; Ju Han Kim; Myung Ho Jeong; Jeong Gwan Cho; Jong Chun Park; Young Joon Hong; Youngkeun Ahn
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Mortality differences between men and women after percutaneous coronary interventions. A 25-year, single-center experience.

Authors:  Mandeep Singh; Charanjit S Rihal; Bernard J Gersh; Veronique L Roger; Malcolm R Bell; Ryan J Lennon; Amir Lerman; David R Holmes
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Twenty-year evolution of percutaneous coronary intervention and its impact on clinical outcomes: a report from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored, multicenter 1985-1986 PTCA and 1997-2006 Dynamic Registries.

Authors:  Lakshmi Venkitachalam; Kevin E Kip; Faith Selzer; Robert L Wilensky; James Slater; Suresh R Mulukutla; Oscar C Marroquin; Peter C Block; David O Williams; Sheryl F Kelsey
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 6.546

6.  Temporal trends in patient-reported angina at 1 year after percutaneous coronary revascularization in the stent era: a report from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored 1997-2006 dynamic registry.

Authors:  Lakshmi Venkitachalam; Kevin E Kip; Suresh R Mulukutla; Faith Selzer; Warren Laskey; James Slater; Howard A Cohen; Robert L Wilensky; David O Williams; Oscar C Marroquin; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell; Clareann H Bunker; Sheryl F Kelsey
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2009-10-13

Review 7.  An overview of PCI in the very elderly.

Authors:  Vimalraj Bogana Shanmugam; Richard Harper; Ian Meredith; Yuvaraj Malaiapan; Peter J Psaltis
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 8.  Prolonged and intensive medication use are associated with the obesity paradox after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 studies.

Authors:  Xiao-Feng Tan; Jia-Xin Shi; And Meng-Hua Chen
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 9.  Does an Obesity Paradox Really Exist After Cardiovascular Intervention?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies.

Authors:  Pravesh Kumar Bundhun; Nuo Li; Meng-Hua Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Recent Trends in Adherence to Secondary Prevention Guidelines for Patients Undergoing Coronary Revascularization in Washington State: An Analysis of the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program (COAP) Registry.

Authors:  Robert F Riley; Creighton W Don; Gabriel S Aldea; Nahush A Mokadam; Jeffrey Probstfield; Charles Maynard; J Richard Goss
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.