| Literature DB >> 16225694 |
Masae Tsutsumi1, Hiroshi Nishiura, Toshio Kobayashi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although senile dementia patients in long-term care facilities are at leading risk of scabies, the epidemiologic characteristics of this disease have yet to be fully clarified. This study documents the findings of a ward-scale nosocomial outbreak in western Japan from 1989-90, for which permission to publish was only recently obtained.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16225694 PMCID: PMC1276794 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-5-85
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Figure 1Temporal distribution of the scabies cases (n = 20) according to the time of diagnosis. Biweekly numbers of cases diagnosed on the dates given are shown.
Figure 2Duration of illness of the scabies cases. Duration is shown at two-week intervals. Note: illness onset was biased by the delay in diagnosis.
Figure 3Spatial distribution of the scabies cases (n = 20) with time. Ward-scale spatial distribution of the scabies cases are shown as of a) 15 July, b) 5 October, c) 23 November and d) 7 December, 1989. Circles and squares denote inpatients sleeping on futons directly on tatami flooring and beds, respectively. Red denotes individuals able to move without assistance and beyond their room, purple denotes those able to move without assistance but only within their room, pink denotes those unable to move without assistance, and light blue denotes those who recovered from scabies. N, nurse station; R, recreation room (for occupational therapy); area enclosed by a dashed line, Western style room with wooden flooring. Slight relocation of individuals is not shown.
Figure 4Comparative distributions of the duration of illness after implementation of control measures.
Univariate analysis: senile dementia-specific risk factors related to scabies, and comparisons between infected and non-infected individuals
| Scabies cases (n = 20) | Non-infected individuals (n = 45) | p-value$ | Odds ratio† (95% CI)* | |
| 2 | 6 | NS§ | 0.7 (0.1 – 4.0) | |
| 19 | 42 | NS | 1.4 (0.1 – 13.9) | |
| 18 | 37 | NS | 1.9 (0.4 – 10.1) | |
| 17 | 15 | 0.0001 | 11.3 (2.9 – 44.8) | |
| 12 | 12 | 0.0136 | 4.1 (1.4 – 12.5) |
$Two-tailed; †Odds ratio of being infected through exposure; *95% Confidence interval; §NS: not significant.