Literature DB >> 16224710

Genetic correlations with floral display lead to sexual dimorphism in the cost of reproduction.

Lynda F Delph1, Janet L Gehring, A Michele Arntz, Maureen Levri, Frank M Frey.   

Abstract

In dioecious plants, females typically invest more biomass in reproduction than males and consequently experience stronger life-history trade-offs. Sexual dimorphism in life history runs counter to this pattern in Silene latifolia: females acquire less carbon and invest more biomass in reproduction, but males pay a higher cost of reproduction. The species is sexually dimorphic for many traits, especially flower number, with males producing many, small flowers compared to females. We tested whether the cost of reproduction is higher in males because flower number, which we presume to be under sexual selection in males, is genetically correlated with traits that would affect life-history trade-offs. We performed artificial selection to reduce the sexual dimorphism in flower size and looked at correlated responses in ecophysiological traits. We found significant correlated responses in total vegetative mass, leaf mass, leaf thickness, and measures of CO(2) exchange. Individuals in the many-and-small-flowered selection lines did not grow as large or invest as much biomass in leaves, and their leaves exhibited an up-regulated physiology that shortened leaf life span. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that genetic correlations between floral display and ecophysiological traits lead to a higher cost of reproduction for males.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16224710     DOI: 10.1086/444597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  17 in total

1.  Roots, shoots and reproduction: sexual dimorphism in size and costs of reproductive allocation in an annual herb.

Authors:  Mark S Harris; John R Pannell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sexual dimorphic floral development in dioecious plants revealed by transcriptome, phytohormone, and DNA methylation analysis in Populus tomentosa.

Authors:  Yuepeng Song; Kaifeng Ma; Dong Ci; Qingqing Chen; Jiaxing Tian; Deqiang Zhang
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Molecular and quantitative genetic differentiation in European populations of Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae).

Authors:  Céline Jolivet; Giorgina Bernasconi
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  The effects of inbreeding, genetic dissimilarity and phenotype on male reproductive success in a dioecious plant.

Authors:  Frédéric Austerlitz; Gabriela Gleiser; Sara Teixeira; Giorgina Bernasconi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Pleiotropic effects of sex-determining genes in the evolution of dioecy in two plant species.

Authors:  Takashi Akagi; Deborah Charlesworth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Genetic differences among populations in sexual dimorphism: evidence for selection on males in a dioecious plant.

Authors:  Q Yu; E D Ellen; M J Wade; L F Delph
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Similar gender dimorphism in the costs of reproduction across the geographic range of Fraxinus ornus.

Authors:  Miguel Verdú; Kostas Spanos; Ingrid Canová; Branko Slobodník; Ladislav Paule
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Sexual dimorphism and rapid turnover in gene expression in pre-reproductive seedlings of a dioecious herb.

Authors:  Guillaume G Cossard; Melissa A Toups; John R Pannell
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Dioecious Silene latifolia plants show sexual dimorphism in the vegetative stage.

Authors:  Jitka Zluvova; Jiri Zak; Bohuslav Janousek; Boris Vyskot
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 4.215

Review 10.  Sexual conflict in plants.

Authors:  N G Prasad; S Bedhomme
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.508

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.