Literature DB >> 16224500

Cardiovascular medications in primary care: treatment gaps and targeting by absolute risk.

Natasha Rafter1, Jennie Connor, Jason Hall, Rod Jackson, Isobel Martin, Varsha Parag, Stephen Vander Hoorn, Anthony Rodgers.   

Abstract

AIM: To measure the use of three major types of cardiovascular medications (antiplatelet, blood pressure lowering, and cholesterol lowering) in primary care, and their level of targeting to individuals at high absolute risk of a cardiovascular event.
METHODS: Demographic, risk factor, and prescribing data from the Dunedin Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners Research Unit database were analysed. The data set consisted of 25,384 individuals, men aged at least 45 years and women at least 55 years, who consulted a doctor in 2000 in a practice which supplied electronic clinical notes. People with congestive heart failure were excluded. Five-year risk of a cardiovascular event was estimated using a history of vascular disease or the Framingham risk equation, and correlated with prescribed medications.
RESULTS: Cardiovascular risk could be estimated for only one-third of the study population due to missing risk factor information. Data were largely unavailable on antiplatelet agents and so lipid lowering and blood pressure lowering medications were used to assess the 'treatment gap'. This combination was prescribed to only 28% of those with documented cardiovascular disease. For the remainder without a history of disease and for whom 5-year absolute risk of cardiovascular disease could be estimated, prescription of combination therapy ranged from 8% in the lowest risk group (<5% 5-year risk) to 14-16% in the other risk categories.
CONCLUSIONS: Among this primary care population, more than two-thirds of people with vascular disease were not receiving guideline-recommended medications and there was little evidence of targeting by absolute risk for those without disease. However limited conclusions can be made for the latter group because of lack of documented risk factor information. While these treatment gaps may be less now, for example due to increased access to statins, it is probable that substantial gaps remain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16224500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Med J        ISSN: 0028-8446


  4 in total

Review 1.  The knowledge-to-action cycle: identifying the gaps.

Authors:  Alison Kitson; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Developing high-specificity anti-hypertensive alerts by therapeutic state analysis of electronic prescribing records.

Authors:  Svetla Gadzhanova; Ivan I Iankov; James R Warren; Jan Stanek; Gary M Misan; Zak Baig; Lorenzo Ponte
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Phenomics of Vascular Disease: The Systematic Approach to the Combination Therapy.

Authors:  Yeshan Han; Li Li; Yaping Zhang; Hong Yuan; Linda Ye; Jianzhong Zhao; Dayue Darrel Duan
Journal:  Curr Vasc Pharmacol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.719

4.  Strategies for prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults with hypertension.

Authors:  Paul K Whelton; Norm R C Campbell; Daniel T Lackland; Gianfranco Parati; C Venkata S Ram; Michael A Weber; Xin-Hua Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.