Literature DB >> 16224410

Comparative efficacy and safety of gemtuzumab ozogamicin monotherapy and high-dose cytarabine combination therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse.

Lance H Leopold1, Mark S Berger, Su-Chun Cheng, Jorge E Cortes-Franco, Francis J Giles, Elihu H Estey.   

Abstract

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin was recently approved in the United States for the treatment of older patients with CD33-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first relapse. However, the lack of randomized clinical trials makes it so difficult to determine which patients are best suited for this compared with other treatment regimens. Results for 128 patients given gemtuzumab ozogamicin in phase II trials were compared with those for 128 patients given high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) combination therapy in different trials Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze age, duration of first complete remission (CR1), and cytogenetics for potential differences between the groups. rare of overall remission )combined complete remission [CR] plus CR with incomplete platelet recovery [CRp]) following treatment with gemtuzumab ozogamicin or HDAC therapy were 38% and 41%, respectively. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin treatment was associated with a higher overall remission rate compared with HDAC treatment if CR1 duration was 3-10.5 months. In contrast, HDAC treatment was associated with a higher overall remission rate than gemtuzumab ozogamicin treatment if CR1 duration was >19 months. If CR1 duration was between 10.5 and 19 months, the differences in treatment responses were not statistically significant. Thee results reflect the much stronger treatment than with gemtuzumab ozogamicin treatment. Early death (occurring within the first 6 weeks of therapy) was less likely in patients <45 years of age after ADAC and was less likely in patients >75 years of age after gemtuzumab ozogamicin treatment. These data support the recommended use of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as monotherapy in older patients with AML in first relapse, but caution against this use in patients, particularly younger ones, with a long duration of CR1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 16224410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Adv Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 1543-0790


  5 in total

Review 1.  Acute myeloid leukaemia: optimal management and recent developments.

Authors:  Luis Villela; Javier Bolaños-Meade
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Two dosing regimens of tosedostat in elderly patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (OPAL): a randomised open-label phase 2 study.

Authors:  Jorge Cortes; Eric Feldman; Karen Yee; David Rizzieri; Anjali S Advani; Anthony Charman; Richard Spruyt; Martin Toal; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 3.  Efficacy and resistance of gemtuzumab ozogamicin for acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Akihiro Takeshita
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  Phase II, multicenter, randomized trial of CPX-351 (cytarabine:daunorubicin) liposome injection versus intensive salvage therapy in adults with first relapse AML.

Authors:  Jorge E Cortes; Stuart L Goldberg; Eric J Feldman; David A Rizzeri; Donna E Hogge; Melissa Larson; Arnaud Pigneux; Christian Recher; Gary Schiller; Krzysztof Warzocha; Hagop Kantarjian; Arthur C Louie; Jonathan E Kolitz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Targeted treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in older adults: role of gemtuzumab ozogamicin.

Authors:  Hien K Duong; Mikkael A Sekeres
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.458

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.