Literature DB >> 16223828

Standard deviations and standard errors.

Douglas G Altman1, J Martin Bland.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2005        PMID： 16223828      PMCID： PMC1255808          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.331.7521.903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

Review 1.  Review of the use of statistics in infection and immunity.

Authors:  Cara H Olsen
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Misuse of standard error of the mean (SEM) when reporting variability of a sample. A critical evaluation of four anaesthesia journals.

Authors:  P Nagele
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Statistics notes: the normal distribution.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-02-04

4.  Quartiles, quintiles, centiles, and other quantiles.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-10-15
  4 in total
  109 in total

1.  Presenting data: can you follow a recipe?

Authors:  Gordon B Drummond; Brian D M Tom
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Reply to: doi:10.1007/s0046-4-010-1485-0: Re: Evaluation of factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: "narrow pelvis" is not a contraindication (Surg Endosc 2011 Jan;25:1907-1912): What factors should be considered in the preoperative planning of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery?

Authors:  Satoshi Ogiso; Takashi Yamaguchi; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Enhancement of radiation effect on cancer cells by gold-pHLIP.

Authors:  Michael P Antosh; Dayanjali D Wijesinghe; Samana Shrestha; Robert Lanou; Yun Hu Huang; Thomas Hasselbacher; David Fox; Nicola Neretti; Shouheng Sun; Natallia Katenka; Leon N Cooper; Oleg A Andreev; Yana K Reshetnyak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Statistics in experimental cerebrovascular research-comparison of two groups with a continuous outcome variable.

Authors:  Peter Schlattmann; Ulrich Dirnagl
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  In brief: Standard deviation and standard error.

Authors:  David J Biau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of utility-based quality of life for osteoporosis-related conditions.

Authors:  L Si; T M Winzenberg; B de Graaff; A J Palmer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  WITHDRAWN: Arthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Toon F M Boselie; Paul C Willems; Henk van Mameren; Rob de Bie; Edward C Benzel; Henk van Santbrink
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-21

8.  Transbronchial biopsy catheter enhanced by a multisection continuum robot with follow-the-leader motion.

Authors:  Lenny Dupourqué; Fumitaro Masaki; Yolonda L Colson; Takahisa Kato; Nobuhiko Hata
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 9.  Meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of droxidopa for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension.

Authors:  Ahmed Elgebaly; Bassant Abdelazeim; Omar Mattar; Mohamed Gadelkarim; Rehab Salah; Ahmed Negida
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 4.435

10.  Major-effect candidate genes identified in cultivated strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) for ellagic acid deoxyhexoside and pelargonidin-3-O-malonylglucoside biosynthesis, key polyphenolic compounds.

Authors:  Jahn Davik; Kjersti Aaby; Matteo Buti; Muath Alsheikh; Nada Šurbanovski; Stefan Martens; Dag Røen; Daniel James Sargent
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 6.793
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.