Literature DB >> 16223615

Patterns, incidence and predictive factors for pain after interventional radiology.

A England1, C L Tam, D E Thacker, A L Walker, A S Parkinson, W Demello, A J Bradley, J S Tuck, H-U Laasch, J S Butterfield, R J Ashleigh, R E England, D F Martin.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate prospectively the pattern, severity and predictive factors of pain after interventional radiological procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing non-arterial radiological interventional procedures were assessed using a visual-analogue scale (VAS) for pain before and at regular intervals for 24 h after their procedure.
RESULTS: One hundred and fifty patients (87 men, mean age 62 years, range 18-92 years) were entered into the study. Significant increases in VAS score occurred 8 h after percutaneous biliary procedures (+47.7 mm, SD 14.9 mm; p=0.001), 6 h after central venous access and gastrostomy insertion (+23.7 mm, SD 19.5 mm; p=0.001 and +28.4 mm, SD 9.7 mm; p=0.007, respectively) and 4h after oesophageal stenting (+27.8 mm, SD 20.2 mm, p=0.001). Non-significant increases in VAS pain score were observed after duodenal and colonic stenting (duodenal: +5.13 mm, SD 7.47 mm; p=0.055, colonic: +23.3 mm, SD 13.10 mm, p=0.250) at a mean of 5h (range 4-6h). Patients reported a significant reduction in pain score for nephrostomy insertion (-28.4mm, SD 7.11 mm, p=0.001). Post-procedural analgesia was required in 99 patients (69.2%), 40 (28.0%) requiring opiates. Maximum post-procedural VAS pain score was significantly higher in patients who had no pre-procedural analgesia (p=0.003).
CONCLUSION: Post-procedural pain is common and the pattern and severity of pain between procedures is variable. Pain control after interventional procedures is often inadequate, and improvements in pain management are required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16223615     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2005.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  6 in total

1.  Qualitative assessment of pain management in patients undergoing computed tomography-guided transthoracic lung biopsy.

Authors:  Erin Thomas Wong; Carol Dunham; Demetris Patsios
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 2.  Medical management of tumor lysis syndrome, postprocedural pain, and venous thromboembolism following interventional radiology procedures.

Authors:  Ali Faramarzalian; Keith B Armitage; Baljendra Kapoor; Sanjeeva P Kalva
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Pain after Interventional Radiology in Oncology: A Case-Control Study from a 5-Year Cohort.

Authors:  Narimane Ayaden; Philippe Sitbon; Arnaud Pages; Lambros Tselikas; Jean-Louis Bourgain
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  [Patient information and informed consent in interventional radiology].

Authors:  M Marschner; C Stroszczynski
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Rigid inflatable gastrostomy tube malposition.

Authors:  Timothy E Murray; Michael J Lee
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2017-08-16

6.  Interventional radiology and the care of the oncology patient.

Authors:  Siobhan B O'Neill; Owen J O'Connor; Max F Ryan; Michael M Maher
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-03-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.