Literature DB >> 16223357

Why are modern families small? Toward an evolutionary and cultural explanation for the demographic transition.

Lesley Newson1, Tom Postmes, S E G Lea, Paul Webley.   

Abstract

As societies modernize, they go through what has become known as "the demographic transition;" couples begin to limit the size of their families. Models to explain this change assume that reproductive behavior is either under individual control or under social control. The evidence that social influence plays a role in the control of reproduction is strong, but the models cannot adequately explain why the development of small family norms always accompanies modernization. We suggest that the widening of social networks, which has been found to occur with modernization, is sufficient to explain the change in reproductive norms if it is assumed that (a) advice and comment on reproduction that passes among kin is more likely to encourage the creation of families than that which passes among nonkin and (b) this advice and comment influence the social norms induced from the communications. This would, through a process of cultural evolution, lead to the development of norms that make it increasingly difficult to have large families.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16223357     DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0904_5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev        ISSN: 1532-7957


  28 in total

Review 1.  Understanding variation in human fertility: what can we learn from evolutionary demography?

Authors:  Rebecca Sear; David W Lawson; Hillard Kaplan; Mary K Shenk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Modernizing Evolutionary Anthropology : Introduction to the Special Issue.

Authors:  Siobhán M Mattison; Rebecca Sear
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2016-12

Review 3.  Parental investment and the optimization of human family size.

Authors:  David W Lawson; Ruth Mace
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The impact of kin availability, parental religiosity, and nativity on fertility differentials in the late 19th-century United States.

Authors:  J David Hacker; Evan Roberts
Journal:  Demogr Res       Date:  2017-10-13

5.  Towards Improving Surveys of Living Arrangements among Poor African Americans.

Authors:  Andrew Golub; Jennifer Strickler; Eloise Dunlap
Journal:  J Comp Fam Stud       Date:  2012-07

6.  Differences in intergenerational fertility associations by sex and race in Saba, Dutch Caribbean, 1876-2004.

Authors:  Julia A Jennings; Paul W Leslie
Journal:  Hist Fam       Date:  2013-01-01

7.  Optimizing Modern Family Size: Trade-offs between Fertility and the Economic Costs of Reproduction.

Authors:  David W Lawson; Ruth Mace
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2010-03-09

8.  Current evolutionary adaptiveness of psychiatric disorders: Fertility rates, parent-child relationship quality, and psychiatric disorders across the lifespan.

Authors:  Nicholas C Jacobson
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2016-06-30

9.  Why do women have more children than they want? Understanding differences in women's ideal and actual family size in a natural fertility population.

Authors:  Lisa McAllister; Michael Gurven; Hillard Kaplan; Jonathan Stieglitz
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 1.937

Review 10.  Wealth, fertility and adaptive behaviour in industrial populations.

Authors:  Gert Stulp; Louise Barrett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.