Literature DB >> 1622311

Spontaneous coping strategies to manage acute pain and anxiety during electrodiagnostic studies.

S P Buckelew1, R C Conway, M S Shutty, J A Lawrence, M R Grafing, S K Anderson, J E Hewett, F J Keefe.   

Abstract

Electrodiagnostic studies produce both anxiety and pain, which can prevent adequate examination and limit the usefulness of test results. This study examined the spontaneous coping strategies used to manage the pain and anxiety experienced during electrodiagnostic testing. Fifty patients (26 women and 24 men) evaluated in our electrodiagnostic laboratory were administered visual analogue scale (VAS) pain and anxiety measures and the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) before the procedure. Immediately after the procedure, subjects reported pain, anxiety, and coping strategies used during electrodiagnostic testing using the VAS, the STAI, and a situation-specific version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ-S). The CSQ-S appears to be a valid and reliable measure of spontaneous coping strategies. Multiple-regression analyses revealed that frequent use of catastrophizing, diverting attention, and coping self-statement strategies was significantly and positively correlated with pain, whereas reinterpreting pain was significantly and negatively associated with pain. Judgments of control over pain were also significantly and negatively associated with anxiety experienced during electrodiagnostic studies. Physicians' ratings of pain and anxiety were highly correlated with patients' self-reports. This study suggests that ineffective coping strategies may enhance the pain and anxiety experienced during electromyography. Alternatively, teaching subjects active self-control skills and increasing patients' self-efficacy beliefs may help manage this situation-specific acute anxiety and, possibly, the associated pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1622311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  3 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes.

Authors:  S M Meints; R R Edwards
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.067

2.  Acceptance, appraisals, and coping in relation to migraine headache: an evaluation of interrelationships using daily diary methods.

Authors:  Christine Chiros; William H O'Brien
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2011-01-22

3.  Factors influencing aversion to specific electrodiagnostic studies.

Authors:  Nivedita U Jerath; Scott B Strader; Chandan G Reddy; Andrea Swenson; Jun Kimura; Edward Aul
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.708

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.