Literature DB >> 16221821

Preliminary investigation of air bubbling and dietary sulfur reduction to mitigate hydrogen sulfide and odor from swine waste.

O Grant Clark1, Brent Morin, Yongcheng Zhang, Willem C Sauer, John J R Feddes.   

Abstract

When livestock manure slurry is agitated, the sudden release of hydrogen sulfide (H(2)S) can raise concentrations to dangerous levels. Low-level air bubbling and dietary S reduction were evaluated as methods for reducing peak H(2)S emissions from swine (Sus scrofa) manure slurry samples. In a first experiment, 15-L slurry samples were stored in bench-scale digesters and continuously bubbled with air at 0 (control), 5, or 10 mL min(-1) for 28 d. The 5-L headspace of each digester was also continuously ventilated at 40 mL min(-1) and the mean H(2)S concentration in the outlet air was <10 microL L(-1). On Day 28, the slurry was agitated suddenly. The peak H(2)S concentration exceeded instrument range (>120 microL L(-1)) from the control treatment, and was 47 and 3.4 microL L(-1) for the 5 and 10 mL min(-1) treatments, respectively. In a second experiment, individually penned barrows were fed rations with dietary S concentrations of 0.34, 0.24, and 0.15% (w/w). Slurry derived from each diet was bubbled with air in bench-scale digesters, as before, at 10 mL min(-1) for 12 d and the mean H(2)S concentration in the digester outlet air was 11 microL L(-1). On Day 12, the slurry was agitated but the H(2)S emissions did not change significantly. Both low-level bubbling of air through slurry and dietary S reduction appear to be viable methods for reducing peak H(2)S emissions from swine manure slurry at a bench scale, but these approaches must be validated at larger scales.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16221821     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2004.0435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  2 in total

1.  Microbial sulfate reduction by Desulfovibrio is an important source of hydrogen sulfide from a large swine finishing facility.

Authors:  Olga V Karnachuk; Igor I Rusanov; Inna A Panova; Mikhail A Grigoriev; Viacheslav S Zyusman; Elena A Latygolets; Maksat K Kadyrbaev; Eugeny V Gruzdev; Alexey V Beletsky; Andrey V Mardanov; Nikolai V Pimenov; Nikolai V Ravin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Performance comparison of MOF and other sorbent materials in removing key odorants emitted from pigpen slurry.

Authors:  Ezaz Ahmed; Akash Deep; Eilhann E Kwon; Richard J C Brown; Ki-Hyun Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.