Literature DB >> 16221517

Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 2): variation by patients' characteristics.

F J T Burke1, P S K Lucarotti, R L Holder.   

Abstract

AIM: It is the purpose of this paper to investigate the outcome of direct-placement restorations provided within the General Dental Services in England and Wales, and to identify the patient factors which may affect this using a database derived from patient treatment data at the Dental Practice Board.
METHODS: For this work, survival of a restoration was considered to be the time between the date of completion of the course of treatment in which it was placed and the date of acceptance of the course of treatment when the next tooth-specific treatment was carried out on the same tooth. A modified version of Kaplan-Meier statistical methodology was used to plot survival curves for restorations in different subgroups of patients within the population of patients for whom data were available.
RESULTS: The results indicated that patients' gender was of little significance in the long-term survival of restorations, but patient age had a significant effect, with the restorations of older patients surviving less well than those of younger patients (P<0.001). The charge-paying status of the patient had a statistically significant but small effect (P<0.001), with survival for charge-payers being slightly higher throughout the observation period. There was a strong relationship between attendance frequency and survival time, with restorations of more frequent attenders performing less well than those of less frequent attenders (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patient factors such as age, charge-paying status, interval between courses of treatment, continuity of care by one dentist, and annual gross fees incurred, have all been found to influence the survival of directly placed restorations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16221517     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  9 in total

1.  When to intervene in the caries process? An expert Delphi consensus statement.

Authors:  Falk Schwendicke; Christian Splieth; Lorenzo Breschi; Avijit Banerjee; Margherita Fontana; Sebastian Paris; Michael F Burrow; Felicity Crombie; Lyndie Foster Page; Patricia Gatón-Hernández; Rodrigo Giacaman; Neeraj Gugnani; Reinhard Hickel; Rainer A Jordan; Soraya Leal; Edward Lo; Hervé Tassery; William Murray Thomson; David J Manton
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Risk factors for failure in the management of cervical caries lesions.

Authors:  R J Wierichs; E J Kramer; H Meyer-Lueckel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Factors influencing patients' continuing attendance at a given dentist.

Authors:  P S K Lucarotti; F J T Burke
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  The ultimate guide to restoration longevity in England and Wales. Part 1: methodology.

Authors:  P S K Lucarotti; F J T Burke
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Longevity of posterior composite restorations in children suffering from early childhood caries-results from a retrospective study.

Authors:  Merve Bayram; Beyza Ballı Akgöl; Nilüfer Üstün
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Repair vs replacement of failed restorations in general dental practice: factors influencing treatment choices and outcomes.

Authors:  H Javidi; M Tickle; V R Aggarwal
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.626

7.  Cost-effectiveness of caries excavations in different risk groups - a micro-simulation study.

Authors:  Falk Schwendicke; Sebastian Paris; Michael Stolpe
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  A retrospective analysis of caries treatment and development in relation to assessed caries risk in an adult population in Sweden.

Authors:  Ulf Söderström; Ingegerd Johansson; Karin Sunnegårdh-Grönberg
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Dental Treatment in a State-Funded Primary Dental Care Facility: Contextual and Individual Predictors of Treatment Need?

Authors:  Kristina L Wanyonyi; David R Radford; Jennifer E Gallagher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.