Literature DB >> 16221286

Influence of aging on thermal and vibratory thresholds of quantitative sensory testing.

Yea-Huey Lin1, Song-Chou Hsieh, Chi-Chao Chao, Yang-Chyuan Chang, Sung-Tsang Hsieh.   

Abstract

Quantitative sensory testing has become a common approach to evaluate thermal and vibratory thresholds in various types of neuropathies. To understand the effect of aging on sensory perception, we measured warm, cold, and vibratory thresholds by performing quantitative sensory testing on a population of 484 normal subjects (175 males and 309 females), aged 48.61 +/- 14.10 (range 20-86) years. Sensory thresholds of the hand and foot were measured with two algorithms: the method of limits (Limits) and the method of level (Level). Thresholds measured by Limits are reaction-time-dependent, while those measured by Level are independent of reaction time. In addition, we explored (1) the correlations of thresholds between these two algorithms, (2) the effect of age on differences in thresholds between algorithms, and (3) differences in sensory thresholds between the two test sites. Age was consistently and significantly correlated with sensory thresholds of all tested modalities measured by both algorithms on multivariate regression analysis compared with other factors, including gender, body height, body weight, and body mass index. When thresholds were plotted against age, slopes differed between sensory thresholds of the hand and those of the foot: for the foot, slopes were steeper compared with those for the hand for each sensory modality. Sensory thresholds of both test sites measured by Level were highly correlated with those measured by Limits, and thresholds measured by Limits were higher than those measured by Level. Differences in sensory thresholds between the two algorithms were also correlated with age: thresholds of the foot were higher than those of the hand for each sensory modality. This difference in thresholds (measured with both Level and Limits) between the hand and foot was also correlated with age. These findings suggest that age is the most significant factor in determining sensory thresholds compared with the other factors of gender and anthropometric parameters, and this provides a foundation for investigating the neurobiologic significance of aging on the processing of sensory stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16221286     DOI: 10.1111/j.1085-9489.2005.10305.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Peripher Nerv Syst        ISSN: 1085-9489            Impact factor:   3.494


  45 in total

1.  Age differences in orofacial sensory thresholds.

Authors:  M W Heft; M E Robinson
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Physiological correlates of age-related decline in vibrotactile sensitivity.

Authors:  Nandini Deshpande; E Jeffery Metter; Shari Ling; Robin Conwit; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 4.673

3.  Thermal perception thresholds among young adults exposed to hand-transmitted vibration.

Authors:  T Nilsson; L Burström; M Hagberg; R Lundström
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-01-05       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Acute effects of vibration on thermal perception thresholds.

Authors:  Lage Burström; Ronnie Lundström; Fredrik Sjödin; Asta Lindmark; Markus Lindkvist; Mats Hagberg; Tohr Nilsson
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Lower thermal sensation in normothermic and mildly hyperthermic older adults.

Authors:  Ryosuke Takeda; Daiki Imai; Akina Suzuki; Akemi Ota; Nooshin Naghavi; Yoshihiro Yamashina; Yoshikazu Hirasawa; Hisayo Yokoyama; Toshiaki Miyagawa; Kazunobu Okazaki
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Memory-guided force control in healthy younger and older adults.

Authors:  Kristina A Neely; Shaadee Samimy; Samantha L Blouch; Peiyuan Wang; Amanda Chennavasin; Michele T Diaz; Nancy A Dennis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Interoceptive awareness declines with age.

Authors:  Sahib S Khalsa; David Rudrauf; Daniel Tranel
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  The fine tuning of pain thresholds: a sophisticated double alarm system.

Authors:  Léon Plaghki; Céline Decruynaere; Paul Van Dooren; Daniel Le Bars
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Age and race effects on pain sensitivity and modulation among middle-aged and older adults.

Authors:  Joseph L Riley; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Toni L Glover; Christopher D King; Burel R Goodin; Kimberly T Sibille; Emily J Bartley; Matthew S Herbert; Adriana Sotolongo; Barri J Fessler; David T Redden; Roland Staud; Laurence A Bradley; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 5.820

10.  Early diabetic neuropathy: thermal thresholds and intraepidermal nerve fibre density in patients with normal nerve conduction studies.

Authors:  Sissel Løseth; Erik Stålberg; Rolf Jorde; Svein Ivar Mellgren
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.