Literature DB >> 1622035

Strain differences in autotomy in rats undergoing sciatic nerve transection or repair.

M M Carr1, T J Best, S E Mackinnon, P J Evans.   

Abstract

The degree of self-mutilation (autotomy) following sciatic nerve injury was assessed in 6 rat strains. Experimental groups included sciatic nerve transection with and without repair and crush lesions. The degree of autotomy was measured using a standard grading system. There were statistically significant differences between the strains in the transected group in terms of both degree of autotomy and the time of onset of its appearance. The repair group showed a shorter mean time of onset, lower maximal scores, and lower percentage of affected animals. Autotomy was absent in the nerve crush group and in all Lewis rats. In experimental studies when the status of the foot is critical (e.g., to evaluate functional walking patterns) Lewis rats appear to be the most appropriate strain to utilize. These results suggest that there are definite strain differences in the degree of autotomy following nerve transection or repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1622035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  15 in total

1.  Differences in forebrain activation in two strains of rat at rest and after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Pamela E Paulson; A L Gorman; Robert P Yezierski; Kenneth L Casey; Thomas J Morrow
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Upslope treadmill exercise enhances motor axon regeneration but not functional recovery following peripheral nerve injury.

Authors:  Jill Cannoy; Sam Crowley; Allen Jarratt; Kelly LeFevere Werts; Krista Osborne; Sohee Park; Arthur W English
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  The genetic mediation of individual differences in sensitivity to pain and its inhibition.

Authors:  J S Mogil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Comparative Behavioral Assessment of Lewis and Nude Rats after Peripheral Nerve Injury.

Authors:  Ebrahim Alawadhi; Tak- Ho Chu; Rajiv Midha
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 0.982

5.  Centella asiatica (L.)-Neurodifferentiated Mesenchymal Stem Cells Promote the Regeneration of Peripheral Nerve.

Authors:  Hanita Mohd Hussin; Mahazura Mat Lawi; Nor Hazla Mohamed Haflah; Abdul Yazid Mohd Kassim; Ruszymah Bt Hj Idrus; Yogeswaran Lokanathan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 4.169

6.  A New System and Paradigm for Chronic Stimulation of Denervated Rat Muscle.

Authors:  Michael P Willand; Juan Pablo Lopez; Hubert de Bruin; Margaret Fahnestock; Michael Holmes; James R Bain
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.553

7.  The effects of picric acid (2,4,6-trinitrophenol) and a bite-deterrent chemical (denatonium benzoate) on autotomy in rats after peripheral nerve lesion.

Authors:  Matin Sadat Firouzi; Masoumeh Firouzi; Mohammad Hossein Nabian; Leila Oryadi Zanjani; Shayan Abdollah Zadegan; Reza Shahryar Kamrani; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 12.625

8.  Determining the effects of electrical stimulation on functional recovery of denervated rat gastrocnemius muscle using motor unit number estimation.

Authors:  Michael P Willand; Michael Holmes; James R Bain; Margaret Fahnestock; Hubert de Bruin
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

9.  Strain differences in response to traumatic brain injury in Long-Evans compared to Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Arlene A Tan; Andrea Quigley; Douglas C Smith; Michael R Hoane
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Fabrication of the Composite Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (C-RPNI) in the Adult Rat.

Authors:  Shelby R Svientek; Dan C Ursu; Paul S Cederna; Stephen W P Kemp
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.